He Said She Said

We have a new website

2011-04-01T12:19:00.002+01:00

We have brand new spanking website that is 100% more fantastic than this one!!

You can find it at www.hesaidshesaidfm.com!

If you have a Google account you can follow us by clicking here.

Let us know what you think!

He Said She Said aka James and Helen

Please note that we are no longer updating this blog.

No Strings Attached

2011-03-17T08:44:00.001Z

Thanks for checking out our review of Rango! You can read it over on our new website by clicking here!

If you are reading this on your Google Reader you can add the stream from our new website by clicking here.

Rango

2011-03-06T15:17:00.004Z

I am Number Four

2011-03-06T15:11:00.004Z

Thanks for checking out our review of I am Number Four! You can read it over on our new website by clicking here!

If you are reading this on your Google Reader you can add the stream from our new website by clicking here.

The best film review website?

2011-03-04T15:27:00.001Z

Just Go With It

2011-03-04T09:05:00.004Z

Directed by: Dennis Dugan
Release date: 11 Feb 2011 UK and US
Starring: Adam Sandler, Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Bailee Madison, Griffin Gluck, Brooklyn Decker, Nick Swardson

IMBD Page

He said:

Sandler seems to flop back and fourth between rom-coms aimed at romantically deprived 30 somethings and comedies aimed at horny juvenile men. I'm not sure if this is a deliberate choice on Sandler's part or if he is just playing the cards he's been dealt, but Just Go With It is one of the rare rom-coms where this comedian seems at home in his element.

That isn't to say the film isn't predictable; Helen and I had guessed the narrative after seeing a poster at the cinema (before we had seen so much as a trailer.) The fact is that most romantic comedies follow one of four plot lines:
1)The best friend that wants to be more than friends;
2)The independent woman that doesn't need a partner, but secretly wants one;
3)The two best friends that cross the line of friendship and test their relationship;
and
4)The relationship based on lies, eg: crushing on the best friend's girl/boy, having more or less money than assumed, pretending to be someone else etc...)

While there is nothing wrong with the above formulas it is always nice when a familiar formula is given a fresh coat of paint. Just Go With It is a fun story that doesn't ever feel tired even when you know where the story is heading after the first 20 minutes. Aniston and Sandler have great chemistry on screen and the films two children stole every scene they were in together.

This is a fun film (with a fantastic and unexpected cameo appearance) that at the very least would make for an excellent date night for the parents and has plenty of humour to be enjoyed by the whole family. I really enjoyed it. I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I also really enjoyed this film. Adam Sandler shines in romantic comedies and although there is a part of me that wants him to only ever do films with Drew Barrymore, as James said there is a great chemistry with Aniston. Having seen a lot of heavy films recently it is nice to have had a chance to unwind with some comedies and this one was a great choice.

I felt that the third act stretched a little bit (perhaps due to my impatience with the inevitability of it all) but overall the film was well paced and had no dull moments. This film isn't going to win any awards but in terms of enjoyability it is definitely a winner. As James said the real stars of the show were the children who did indeed steal every scene they were in. Considering the amount of average child performances in movies it is lovely to see such young actors with a firm grasp of comic timing.

I wouldn't describe this film as a 'must see' but I would definitely recommend it as one of the better rom-coms in the barrel-full churned out by Hollywood. The humour is spot on for comedy snobs like me. It has just the right amount of cringe worthy moments but without falling too far into the crude and immature. I think this is a harmless comedy with Adam Sandler at his best. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

They said:

Aniston and Sandler show fantastic chemistry while a true Hollywood star gives a performance like you've never seen her before! We give this film {{{7 out of 10}}}

Excelsior: the February Big Quiz

2011-02-27T17:33:00.004Z

Buff Quiz Questions

1. Director Brad Bird voiced which character in his animated film The Incredibles?
a. Mirage b. Edna E'More c. Mrs Hogenson

2. Before filming Spider-Man 2 Tobey Maguire sustained a back injury. Although he recovered in time to film, who was lined up to take the role over?
a. Jake Gyllenhaal b. Karl Urban c. Casey Affleck

3. Comic book writer Mark Millar is the brains behind Kick-Ass. What Angelina Jolie film was also an adaptation of one of Millar's works?
a. Wanted b. Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow c. Salt

4. V for Vendetta was based on a series of graphic novels by which author?
a. Mike Mignolia b. David Lloyd c. Alan Moore

5. DC comics started life as Detective Comics in which year?
a. 1925 b. 1936 c. 1947

6. The film Ghost World was adapted from a graphic novel to the screen by Terry Zwigoff. What other film has he directed?
a. Beetlejuice b. Bad Santa c. The Island

Noob Quiz Questions:

1. Edward Norton played Bruce Banner aka The Incredible Hulk... but who has been cast in Joss Whedon's film The Avengers to play the same role?
a. Mark Ruffalo b. Jeremy Renner c. Clark Gregg

2. What newspaper does Peter Parker take photographs for?
a. Daily Planet b. The Daily Bugle c. Metropolis Times

3. Gotham city is home to which superhero?
a. Batman b. Captain America c. Deadpool

4. Which of these films is not Marvel?
a. Blade b. Jonah Hex c. X-Men

5. In what year did the original Superman film starring Christopher Reeve come out?
a. 1978 b. 1983 c. 1986

6. Who directed Watchmen?
a. David Slade b. Greg Mottola c. Zack Snyder

Paul

2011-02-21T10:55:00.008Z

Directed by: Greg Mottola
Released: UK 14 Feb 2011, USA 18 Mar 2011
Starring: Nick Frost, Simon Pegg, Kristen Wiig, Jason Bateman, Sigourney Weaver, Blythe Danner, Bll Hader, Jane Lynch, Seth Rogen

IMDB Link

He said:

If I am completely honest I was a bit apprehensive when I saw the first trailer for Paul. As much as I have enjoyed Frost and Pegg onscreen in the past (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) I had assumed that the films were as good as they were because of Edgar Wright calling the shots behind the scenes. Luckily the boys found themselves in capable hands of writer-turned-director Greg Mottola (who directed Superbad and wrote and directed Adventureland)

Paul plays towards its target demographic (14-31 year old males) with its penis jokes and toilet humor without any apologies. The film was co written by Pegg and Frost and is in no uncertain terms an often brilliant lampooning of pop culture from the last thirty years, including Mac and Me which I thoroughly enjoyed as a child but doesn't get nearly as much mention in pop culture as E.T.

Funny side note: (I embarrassed my wife and her parents when I stood up during a climactic scene and shouted along with a character a line that I had been holding my breath in hopes they would take the obviously well laid bait, and then applauded them for doing so.) I am not one that normally encourages outbursts in the cinema, but I am only human.

That isn't to say that this is a geek film, Helen's parents both enjoyed it as much as I did. The story is well written and the pace is spot on. While this film isn't solely a parody there are a lot of winks and nods at other well known alien encounter films from start to finish. I enjoyed this film and give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

If you haven't guessed it by now James and I are kind of nerdy. And with the masses of pop culture references and sci-fi pastiche in Paul nerds are exactly the people who this film is aimed at. I particularly enjoyed a voice cameo by Steven Spielberg and the very fact that Sigourney Weaver is in the film at all makes me happy.

As usual Pegg and Frost's hilarious bromance chemistry won the audience over. While I didn't enjoy this film as much as Shaun of the Dead I did enjoy it much more than Hot Fuzz. Unlike James I wasn't worried about the lack of Edgar Wright but I was concerned about Seth Rogen playing Paul (probably because the last thing I saw him in was The Green Hornet and... oh God the memories, cry). However his voice acting worked really well and funnily enough I found Paul a rather believable creature.

I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys really nerdy, laugh out loud funny comedies. It helps if you have a love of pop culture so you can pick up the references but even without this the story is great. As James said the plot is well paced and keeps your attention well. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They Said: A perfect celebration of alien sci-fi pop culture with moments that will make you cringe and moments that will make you double up with laughter. We give this film {{{8.5 out of 10}}}

Never Let Me Go

2011-02-21T10:26:00.005Z

Directed by: Mark Romanek
Released: UK 11 feb 2011
Starring: Kiera Knightley, Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield

IMDB Link

She said:

I was really keen to see Never Let me Go since it opened the London Film Festival. I enjoy the three actors playing the leads and was really interested to see if their chemistry in interviews translated into this film. When we actually saw this I was really intrigued - and that really is the best word to use.

I didn't know much about the plot apart from it being about three children who grew up together. What the film actually is, without giving the story away, is really a science fiction (not the aliens are attacking us kind... that would just be weird) idea locked in a drama presentation.

I was really moved by the whole picture. It perhaps isn't a film I want to watch over and over again. It is rather deep and challenging in places, but I really enjoyed it. I like coming out from the cinema feeling that I have something new to think about or that my life has been enriched by watching the film. This is one of those films.

I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

He said:

I am really not sure that I have a definitive opinion on Never Let Me Go. It is a film that is very intense and it made me think, but I'm not sure that either of those things are enough to make feel that it was a good film. It was well written and brilliantly acted. The film can not be easily categorized as one specific genre, which is in part the majority of its appeal.

The relationship between the three leading roles was absolutely spot on. The chemistry never felt forced or put on, and even in the quiet moments of the film you believed their emotions were genuine. While I don't have much to say about this film, and it isn't the type of film that invites multiple viewings I did enjoy it. I give it {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said: A beautifully written, beautifully shot drama which, whilst grey and challenging, is bound to find a place in many hearts. We give this film {{{7 out of 10}}}

True Grit

2011-02-17T16:12:00.004Z

Directed by: Joel and Ethan Coen
Release date: 11 Feb 2011 UK / 22 Dec 2010 USA
Starring: Jeff Bridges, Hailee Steinfeld, Matt Damon, Josh Brolin

IMDB page

He said:

I have waited for what seemed like ages for True Grit to finally be released in the U.K. I have always enjoyed the old-west genre and it is very rare that I don't enjoy a Coen brothers film. True Grit successfully ticks all of the boxes of the classic western films that I watched with my grandpa when I was younger.

The role that has gotten the most attention in the reviews thus far is Jeff Bridges portrayal of Rueben "Rooster" Cogburn, the role first made famous by John "The Duke" Wayne. But there are several performances in this film that stand out on their own. Hailee Steinfeld displays amazing poise and skill as the young and spirited Mattie Ross determined to bring her father's murderer to justice.

Matt Damon slipped into the role of Texas Ranger LeBeuf (pronounced lebeef) with ease and is honestly one of my favourite characters in this film, LeBeuf is a man that enjoys the sound of his own voice as much as the pride in his profession as a Texas Ranger. Damon plays the role perfectly and gives the impression that he enjoyed every minute of it.

This film is best described as a traditional western. The pace is relaxed, but the narrative is constantly flowing through out its 110 minute running time. The visuals in this film are absolutely stunning, the Coen brothers used the landscape as it's own individual character providing both conflict and respite for the travelling trio. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I am definitely not a fan of Westerns as a genre. My class was forced to study Westerns in my Sixth Form media class and I have resented them ever since. It is interesting though because I am fascinated by the American West and when I studied its history in a different class I loved it. Bearing all this in mind I was weary about how I would find True Grit but I knew it would be fantastic. It was.

I disagree with my better half. I don't think that this is a traditional Western, I think it is a homage to a traditional Western made for a modern day audience. Where usually I find the Coen brothers strange their style fit this project like a glove. The humour was sharp and witty, and played on the performances the actors were giving. The pace was also much better than in traditional Westerns, which I find slow-paced.

The trio of actors - Steinfield, Damon and Bridges - are the stars of this film. Hailee Steinfield has the rare talent of playing a role completely straight and still making it hilarious, which I think if a rare gift. This worked brilliantly with Bridges and Damon who often acted more like children that the girl did! Very funny. I was glad we went to see this. I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: Whether you're a fan of Westerns or not we think there is something in this film for everyone to enjoy. It also showcases some fantastic performances that will make you laugh and care. We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

Question for the comments: Are you a fan of Westerns?

Easy A

2011-02-12T16:25:00.004Z

Directed by: Will Gluck
Release date: 22 Oct 2010 UK / 17 Sept 2010 USA
Starring: Emma Stone, Amanda Bynes, Stanley Tucci, Dan Byrd, Lisa Kudrow, Thomas Hayden Church, Penn Badgley

IMDB Page

He said:

Helen and I were lucky to catch this film on a single night rerelease last week, thanks in large part to Orange's Rising Star Award nominee promotion (where all last week they had a single showing of films released over the last year including but not limited to, Kick Ass, Inception, Easy A and several others that escape me at the moment.)

I'm happy to say that even with a repeat viewing this film still delivered with out feeling tired or dull, I had seen it the first time back in September of last year when it was first released in the States.

Emma Stone in her first leading role is outstanding as Olive, the self confessed typical high school film do-no-wrong nobody. While it is hard to believe that someone as striking and as quick-witted as Emma Stone would ever do anything than standout when surrounded by her "peers", the film glosses over this small inconsistency with all the grace and speed of the less than subtly referenced John Hughes films that came before it.

This film is an every way an homage to the teen film genre that John Hughes made popular in the eighties proving once and for all at least to me the age old idiom "If it ain't broke don't fix it." It is also a modern spin on Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter (hence the title). I really enjoyed this film, I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

Unlike James this was my first viewing of Easy A however having heard James' praise for it before, and it has to be said from pretty much everyone who had seen it, I was thrilled to see on the big screen. As James said, this film is a real throw back to those good ol' teen films of the Eighties but even more than that; it was a homage. The filmmakers obviously all loved teen films and really wanted to do this film justice. And they did.

This is the second film I have watched Emma Stone in (the first being Zombieland) and she really shined in a lead role. She gives a smart, witty and charismatic performance. I am excited for the Spider-Man reboot even more now.

I want to give a quick mention to Stanley Tucci and the rest of Stone's on screen family. They had a fantastic chemistry and were hilarious. The only performance that seemed out of place was Lisa Kudrow's but this wasn't her so much as a bit of a lost sub-plot.

I really enjoyed this film. Easy A all together was completely aware of its own ridiculousness, turning it to its own advantage. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: This is one to get on DVD for those evenings where you just want a drink and a giggle. We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT IS YOUR FAVE TEEN MOVIE?

He said, She said: Oscar predictions

2011-02-12T08:38:00.001Z

The Mechanic

2011-02-07T22:04:00.006Z

Directed by: Simon West

Released: Worldwide January 28th 2011

Starring: Jason Statham, Ben Foster, Donald Sutherland

IMDB Link

He said:

I should say from the start that I practically had to drag Helen to see this film, to say that it wasn't anywhere to be found on her must see list is an understatement. In her defense this film was as flawed and cliched as the trailer promised. Which is exactly why I enjoyed it, once in a while I really just want to see a craptastic film.

The Mechanic from it's opening scene right up until the fade to credits did everything in it's power to fulfill that wish. Every man's man action film cliche was checked like the naughty list the night before the fat man climbs up onto his sleigh. Including but not limited to an absent father figure, scantily clad women paid for services rendered, chase scenes, explosions and "unlikely but blatantly obvious" escapes.

I feel that I would be doing our readers a great injustice if I told you this film was anything more than it was which is simply: good for a laugh. You are going to be hard pressed to ever find Jason Statham headlining a film with any chance of Academy recognition, he doesn't make those types of films. The man makes mindless guilty pleasure action films wrapped in as many explosions as possible. I give this film {{{2.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

I am going to be honest: when I saw this film I thought it looked like a load of parp and definitely not worth wasting a review on. However as James said, he was keen to see it and so, with an open mind I went along to see what The Mechanic is all about. And guess what? It was parp.

The thing that bothers me about action films like The Mechanic is that there is no reason for them to be so awful. The Mechanic had bad acting, absolutely terrible script writing and a plot that seemed to be held together with 3 year old Blu-tac (you know, when it has gone all hard and not sticky anymore). There are so many actions films out there that are great fun to watch for men and women alike though so I just kept thinking: why?!

By the way I am not even going to bother talking about the portrayal of women in this film. I am sure you can imagine. This film was good for a laugh but not enough to give it any more than a mediocre {{{1.5 out of 5}}}

They said: Not a film that will be to everyone's taste and certainly not one that will be winning any awards but then... we weren't expecting much more really! We give this film {{{4 out of 10}}}

Question of the Blog: What film genre is your guilty pleasure?

The Fighter

2011-02-07T21:50:00.009Z

Directed by: David O. Russell
Released: USA 10-December-2010 UK 02 February 2011
Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Melissa Leo

IMDB Link

She said:

I knew two things when I first saw the trailer for The Fighter: 1. I have no real interest in a film about boxing and 2. This film looks very very good. It was the latter thought, of course, that made me go and see it. And I am very glad I did.

This film is brilliant - there is no other way to say it. There are so many actors who shine in this role, Melissa Leo and Amy Adams are both fantastic, but it has to be said that supporting actor Christian Bale completely overshadowed them all, including lead Mark Wahlberg. Bale is a method actor to an almost disturbing extent. You could see him living this role, which can't have been pleasant, and giving an amazing performance.

I found The Fighter brilliant but challenging to watch. It deals with issues of class, fame, drug abuse, family, relationships, etc - and it does so in a very raw way. Filmed cinema verite style, director Russell pulled me into this story and it stopped being 'a film about boxing', and started being a interesting story about loyalty and self-belief.

I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:

The Fighter may follow the formula of every good sports film to have come before it but it does the formula justice. Bale and Wahlberg both shine in their respective roles. I was not at all surprised to see Bale nominated for his performance as he shows the audience once more the level talent he possesses.

Not to be out done by the films leading men, the Fighter's supporting actresses also brought their A game talent. Adam's stands out especially as Wahlberg's love interest and a role that could not be further from her normal bread and butter (Enchanted, Leap Year and the like.) Melissa Leo is fantastic flawed as the boy's mother/manager.

This is a film very much like last months Black Swan that even if you aren't interested or in the sport/art form at the base of the story you become invested early and for the remainder of the film. If you liked Russell Crowe's Cinderella Man you will enjoy this as well. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: If you aren't a fan of boxing, don't worry - you might find yourself actually getting into it by the time the redits role! We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

Question of the day: What is your favourite sports film?

Tangled

2011-02-03T16:47:00.008Z

Directed by: Nathan Greno, Byron Howard

Release date: USA 24 November 2010 UK 28 Jan 2011

Starring: Mandy Moore, Zachary Levi, Donna Murphy, Ron Pearlman

IMDB page

He said:

Disney's 50th animated film was tasked with filling a very large pair of the mouse's shoes. I am pleased to report that this film delivers a wonderful heart warming film full of the action and romance you expect from the House of Mouse.

After the less than stellar performance of 2009's Princess and the Frog, Tangled has put every effort into making itself appeal to Disney's young male audience as well as it's built in young princess demographic, going as far as changing the title from Rapunzel to Tangled a mere 6 months before the films release.

There are several "Easter Eggs" through out the film that reference Disney's previous 49 animated films (similar to MGM's 20th 007 Bond film Die Another Day) that would likely be even more apparent on repeat viewings. The only reason I noticed as many as I did is that I am constantly looking out for the iconic mouse ears that Disney sneaks into every film.

The long and short of it is simple this is more than just a pretty picture, with a slightly different look at a well known story, well developed characters and an enjoyable mix of action and music this is film for the whole family. I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I enjoyed The Princess and the Frog, which came out last year from Disney, but it wasn't memorable. I can't remember a single song. All I can see in my head are frogs singing something about life on the Bayou. This year we get Tangled and I have a feeling Disney were saving their best work in recent years for the big 50!

The great thing about Disney is that it takes classic stories that you have heard over and over and over, that you think you know so well - and it then injects it with magic and makes it feel like the first time you heard it. Now I have to admit I was always going to like this film because... well, it IS Disney, but I my expectations were actually exceeded. I think I thought I had "grown out" of Disney a little bit. But right from when the shooting went over the castle I got a chill. You never grow out of Disney.

Overall the film is everything you need. There are great songs - some that make you shed a tear, some that make you feel like tapping your toes and jumping into the screen. There was also some really beautiful animation. There was a rugged hero, there was a vulnerable yet capable Princess, there were cute animal sidekicks... what more could you want!

I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: You can probably wait till DVD as the 3D isn't essential but it definately a fun watch at the cinema. We give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

Question of the day: Which of Disney's 50 animated films is your favorite?

Barney's Version

2011-02-03T16:19:00.007Z

Directed by: Richard J. Lewis

Release date: 14 Jan 2011 USA / 28 Jan 2011 UK

Starring: Paul Giamatti, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Lafevre, Rosamund Pike, Minnie Driver, Mark Addy

IMDB page

She said:

I really cannot make up my mind about this film, which I realise is ridiculously unhelpful for those of you wondering whether to go and see this film or not. If you are that person then my advice is see it, then come back here and help me formuate my opinion.

The film is basically the story of an ordinary man with a not-so-ordinary life. The themes of true love, true friendship and family bonds are there but our cigar-smoking alcoholic hero is hardly endearing. He isn't a loveable ass he is simple a bit of an idiot who doesn't appreciate what he has.

That little rant makes it sound like I am not a fan of this film but I didn't hate it! There were some humorous parts and some very touching parts as well. But the film felt long, a bit too long overall. Perhaps this film was meant to challenge the viewer but, alas, I fear it has just didn't quite hit the mark. I give this film {{{2.5 out of 5}}}

He said:

I had a really hard time taking to Giamatti's character through out the entire film. The hard truth is that I don't think Richard Lewis intended to ever show Barney in a positive light. The tag line for the film reads "First he got married. Then he got married again. Then he met the love of his life."

The trailer shows us from the beginning that Barney meets the love of his life during the wedding reception of his second marriage. I don't know about you, but if I saw the groom at a wedding chatting up a woman that wasn't the bride I wouldn't think many positive things.

This is a good film with a fantastic supporting cast, and if I take into consideration that Giamatti was purposely portraying your run of the mill dirt bag I would have to give him top marks in succeeding in that portrayal. This is a quirky film that presents itself as a tale of woe and one of not being afraid to love who you love no matter what. I give it {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said: It is great in some parts and seriously mislead in others. Some bits are funny, some are just annoying. You are going to have to make up your own mind on this one! We gve it {{{6 out of 10}}}

Question for the comments: Are there any other films you just can't make up your mind about?

Black Swan

2011-02-01T16:18:00.006Z

Directed by: Darren Aronofsky

Release date: USA - 17 Dec 10 / UK - 21 Jan 11

Starring: Natalie Portman, Mila Kunis, Vincent Cassel, Winona Ryder

IMDB page

He said:

I am not unfortunately, one of those culturally diverse enough to feel the draw or even the appeal of ballet. Black Swan does a wonderful job of both introducing me to this dancing art form and making it seem more interesting than a bunch of malnourished girls dancing in onesies.

Portman and Kunis shine in this film. Portman portrays a perfectionist rising star thats biggest weaknesses are her weak and fragile appearance and her overbearing mother that is obviously trying to live her forgotten dreams through her daughters dancing career. Ryder has a small but strong role as the "over the hill" former lead/star.

Black Swan welcomes you into it's world with a beautiful interpretation of Swan Lake. This film surprised me time and again and as I watched it and true to it's word was an intense psychological thriller. Rarely do any horror films get as much of a reaction out of as this film did. I really enjoyed it and I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

Sometimes you get a film that just smacks you right in the face with what can only be described as tragic beauty. This is by far one of the best examples of this I have seen in a long long time. The film is basically an interpretation of Swan Lake, one of the most loved ballet's of all time... but y'know... with a serious case of psychosis thrown in for the lolz.

I really enjoyed the fact that this film did something a bit different. Yes of course they had to have the same old boring reference to dancers with eating disorders but I felt that Nina's process of becoming consumed by the Black Swanfar eclipsed the cliches. Aronofsky was very clever to film this in a way that made it feel like a ballet; very fluid but also gripping and tense.

Portman also has to be commended in this film. Forget about the intense mental performance she had to give, just the physical work must have been gruelling. She apparently spent a year training for this film and I can tell you that is really pays off. I am not a ballet exper but her dancing looks flawless to me!

This film is both hard to watch and amazingly beautiful, both elements being emphasised by the score (a variation on Swan Lake). I implore you to see this at some point. I give this film {{{5 out of 5}}}

They said:

Beautiful, thrilling, tragic and tense. We give this film {{{9 out of 10}}}.

Question of the day: Do you prefer in your face horror or subtle thrillers?

The Next Three Days

2011-01-25T06:33:00.006Z

Directed by: Paul Haggis

Released: 19 Nov 2010 USA, 5 Jan 2011 UK

Starring: Russell Crowe, Elizabeth Banks, Daniel Stern, Liam Neeson

IMDB page

He said:

This film asks the question 'what are you willing to risk in order to be with the person you love most'. Paul Haggis asks us to suspend our disbelief after the first ten minutes of the film. I think I struggled to enjoy it because of that - at no point did Crowe's character strike me as anything more than that.

That isn't to knock any of the performances in the film. I think all the actors did a fantastic job with the material they were given it just didn't do anything for me. There seem to be quite a few cameo appearances in this film that seem awkwardly wedged in and unnecessary, usually a sign of panic from the production team behind the film.

This is not a typical prison break type of film but as you can see in the trailer there is a couple of pretty impressive chase scenes in an other wise mediocre film. {{{I give 3 out of 5}}}

She said:

I found this film reasonably enjoyable. There was suspense, action, drama and surprisingly a few moments of humour too. There was something however that stopped this film being brilliant and, as James said, I think that we were required to suspend our disbelief just a little too long.

My biggest issue with films like this is that they try and make you believe that a decent person can flick a switch in their head to become a criminal mastermind who will stop at nothing to get what he wants. Fortunately this film had some believable elements, which lifted it just above the same old/same old.

I really enjoyed seeing Russell Crowe in his first film since Robin Hood. I think he carried the film well and there was a strong, believable chemistry between him and Elizabeth Banks. The actors often had to portray their feelings without many words which is always a test of an actors ability and I think they passed well.

I have a few other gripes, such as actors such as Jason Beghe (who plays a police detective) who added an interesting element but were underevolved, but overall I like this film and would watch it again. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

They said: The Next Three Days (interestingly the title is not present in the film... in more ways than one) is worth watching but we suggest you wait to rent it. We give it [[[6 out of 10]]]

Question for the comments: Do you prefer prison break films or heist films?

The Green Hornet

2011-01-15T13:40:00.008Z

Directed by: Michael Gondry

UK / US Release date: Jan 14 2011

Starring: Seth Rogen, Jay Chou, Tom Wilkinson, Christoph Waltz, Edward James Olmos, Cameron Diaz

IMDB Page

He said:

There are so many things that I could say about this film, but seeing as not one of those things would be constructive I will limit my bitter diatribe to this: Simply put The Green Hornet is a waste of time. The source material provided ample opportunity to produce a different type of hero film. Sadly those opportunities were overlooked and out right ignored in exchange for cheap visuals a very few good practical effects and a stumbling and often seemingly directionless plot.

This is not a comic book film adaptation, The Green Hornet like The Shadow , The Phantom and The Rocketeer before it were originally radio serials long before they were adapted to comics, and at the time were fantastic for their era. It wasn't until Van Williams and Bruce Lee portrayed the duo that our parents generation was introduced to them again.

One of the few nods worth mentioning in the film was a sketch of Bruce Lee in Kato's sketch book. If I am honest I am remiss to slam this film as much as I would have had I wrote this review directly after I left the cinema. It is obvious that Seth Rogen (who lost thirty pounds to portray Britt Reid and also co-wrote the film) really loved this character and attempted to do it's story justice, the sad truth is that he failed. I give this film {{{0.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

I knew this film was going to be awful as soon as I saw the trailer; an incompetently written piece of film puff trying to cash in on the current boom of superhero movies. This film fails to create any kind of affinity with the superhero loving crowd because there is simply no integrity or moral standing to The Green Hornet. This film is crass, offensive and to be honest down-right boring.

Forgetting about the terrible acting for a moment, the script itself was completely dire. There was no pacing (I thought it was going to end a long time before it did... but then again maybe that was wishful thinking) and the overarching story was obviously first draft nonsense. A rewrite or twelve at least may have giving someone on the production team a chance to realise that the film made no kind of ethical sense. And don't get me started on the distastefulness of Diaz's role and how she is treated.

The effects were alright but nothing to write home about. The 3D presentation with no 2D option just showed how desperate the filmmakers were to reel in some kind of return on this pitiful excuse for a film. I give this film {{{0.5 out of 5}}}

They said: Save yourself. Don't see it. If you are stuck on a plane and it is the only film available we suggest you have the nearest obese passenger smother you until you lose consciousness. We give this film {{{1 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT IS THE WORST FILM YOU HAVE EVER SEEN?

It's Kind of a Funny Story

2011-01-14T11:53:00.005Z

Directed by: Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck
UK release date: 7 January 2010
UK release date: 8 October 2010
Starring: Keir Gilchrist, Emma Roberts, Zach Galifianakis, Jeremy Davies

IMDB page

She said:

I had not seen a trailer for this film before I went to see it - I was simply drawn to it because it was set in a mental health hospital and starred Zach Galifianakis (I totally would, fyi). I was expecting something with an indie feel, something a bit quirky and with a bit of heart to it. This is exactly what I got. And to top it off the patients weren't all walking around in padded rooms wearing pyjamas! Huzzah!

This film is essentially a coming-of-age story about self discovery... the clever part was setting it in a psychiatric ward. Where better to learn that life isn't as tragic as it seemed then by being able to compare yourself to people who really are struggling? However by making this film a comedy drama I had concerns it would either trivialise mental health or else glamorize it. In fact it did neither - it struck a nice 'matter of fact' balance, which, as someone who works in a mental health setting, I really appreciated.

Despite a breakthrough performance by young star Keir Gilchrist (who played main character Craig) the star of the film is undoubtedly Zach Galifianakis who plays Bobby, a patient that befriends Craig when he comes into hospital. Bobby is a man who despite the optimism he hands out to others has almost given up on his own life, or at least accepted it the way it is. Kudos to Zach G. for taking on the task of playing such a complex character and still managing to make you leave with a smile rather than wanting to 'check in' yourself.

Overall I thought this was a nice, quirky little film. Perhaps it didn't change my life totally, but it did make me think, and let's be honest teen films don't often do that. By the way if you are wondering yes this is a book and on Amazon's "people who bought this also bought" there are two John Green books as well as 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower' and 'Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist'. I think that tells you much of what you need to know. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

He said:
I really enjoy when a film tugs at my heart strings, for the most part I am not led blindly by my emotions like so many people I have known, but every once in a while I will come across a film of novel that pushes all the right buttons and manages to retrieve an emotion stronger than happy or annoyed.

Keir Gilchrist appears to be a very talented up and coming young actor and he proves in this film that he has the acting chops that so many child actors lack to make the successful jump to adult acting. As Helen says above Galifianakis steals nearly every scene he is in. At one point Helen turned to me during the film and said that she has added Mr Galifianakis to her Guilt Free three, thankfully to me my wife seems to be physically attracted to a body type that is exactly like my own.

The only issue I had with this film is how disingenuous Craig's family seem to be, at no point during the film was I convinced that the boys parents were at all concerned that their child had checked himself into a psych ward in a hospital because of his thoughts of suicide. If anything they appeared to be put out or annoyed that he was seeking attention. Though they were happy to visit him and lend him money. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said: This is a film that is worth watching and may have otherwise gone underneath your radar. We give it [[[7 out of 10]]]

QUESTION OF THE DAY: How many films can you think of that are set in a mental health hospital?

What do films mean to you?

2011-01-12T19:57:00.006Z

We have done this short video telling you some of the words that spring to mind when we think about films. There is no doubt we'll be expanding on these words and feelings more throughout the year, but just to get us started here you go:

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT DO FILMS MEAN TO YOU?

escapism - forgetting you are in the cinema and being whisked away to another place
fantasy - a new world, new creatures, new wonders
education - discovering something you never knew
religion - with sticky popcorn covered chairs as our pews...
imagination - your mind gone wild with dreams you never thought possible
reality - hard hitting truths
emotion- tears and sadness
fun - an afternoon's worth
thrills - action and excitement in front of your eyes
faith and belief - trust in the moviemakers
amazement - unending marvel
potential - the reach of directors', actors', cinematographers' skill
magic - unbelievable tricks of the trade
friendship - shared experiences
solitude - personal meaning
glamour - Hollywood glitz on the red carpet
adventure - swashbuckling, horseriding, speed boats, train wrecks...
art and craft - the beautiful creations of cinema
consumerism - money does make the world go round
understanding - appreciation and acceptance
laughs - happiness and joy
shock - hiding behind your hands... or your partner!
memories - markers for times in your lifes, places you've been, things you've learnt
... life.

The King's Speech

2011-01-10T08:25:00.011Z

Directed by: Tom Hooper
UK release date:Jan 07 2011
UK release date:Dec 10 2010
Starring: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter, Michael Gambon, Guy Pearce

IMDB page

He said:

This is not a film I felt any sort of impulse to see upon first hearing it being discussed. The subject matter to me seemed uninteresting and not at all suited to be a feature length film. Helen on the other hand, has been eagerly awaiting it's release as it is one of her most anticipated films this month.

As an American living in England I am less than casually inundated with little bits of English history on a daily basis. There are very few times that the subject of World War II comes up and it is even more rare that I hear anything more on this moment in history than the fact that the US was a few years late to the big show.

The King's Speech tells what was to me, before last night, an unknown prologue to England entering World War II. England was dealing with having lost two Monarchs within less than a year and just getting to know King George VI. This film weaves so many threads of stories together that it is a true credit to director Tom Hooper that the audience never feels rushed, lost or confused.

There are several outstanding performances in this film, but they all pale in comparison to the Colin Firth's performance of King "Bertie" George VI. Firth manages to portray the King with the strength of Royalty and the frailty of man. The more I think about this film the more I realize how much I enjoyed it. I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

I heard amazing things about this film before I even saw the trailer, and so was expecting great things. When I did get to see the trailer I couldn't wait to get to the cinema and watch what looked to be a masterpiece. My impressions and expectations were met with ease; this film is fantastic.

As someone who has always suffered with issues of confidenceand self esteem I am always drawn toward scenarios where public figures are shown in their most vulnerable state. Selfishly it makes me feel better abut myself. Humbly it makes me realise that we are all human.

The King's Speech showed a man crippled with a speech impediment that was not just a public figure, but that would soon be King and lead a nation during a World War. It was always going to be an incredibly complex role to play with the pressures 'Bertie' faced but Colin Firth really did give the performance of a lifetime. I would be surprised if he isn't nominated for both an Oscar and a Bafta. For that matter Helena Bonham Carter and Geoffrey Rush (who I'd like to see get best supporting) were also impeccible.

Overall this to me was a film about self belief and despite being about the Royal family it was something I could very easily relate to. I am so impressed by this film and its elegant soundtrack. I give it {{{5 out of 5}}}

They said: This is a must see film and is likely to be a heavy contender during this year's award season. Whether you see it as a history lesson or a philanthropic discovery you can't deny this film is a masterpiece. We give it [[[9.5 out of 10]]]

Question of the day: Are than any other films that have changed your perspective on a well known moment in history?

127 Hours

2011-01-08T16:01:00.010Z

Directed by: Danny Boyle
UK release date: Jan 07 2011
US release date: 12 November 2010
Starring: James Franco, Amber Tamblyn, Clémence Poésy, Kate Mara

IMDB Page

He said:

This is the second film based on a true story that Helen and I have reviewed this week and I can say from all reports that this film is more accurate and true to it's inspiration than any film I have seen before it. This is another film that does not invoke that need that need to have repeated viewings, but it is a film that is a must see and when released on DVD will be a must own.

James Franco portrays Aron Ralston brilliantly and has already been nominated for Best Male Performance of the year for both the Golden Globes and the Oscar's and is likely to nab a BAFTA nomination as well. It is no easy task to carry a feature length film almost completely on your own (ala Tom Hanks in Castaway or Ryan Reynolds in Buried) but Franco has shown both his skill as an artist and his talent as an entertainer.

My only real complaint with this film is Danny Boyle's apparent need to spice it up with random choppy delusion sequences that did not really differentiate themselves from reality. While I acknowledge that a couple of these might have been intentional I doubt that scenes like the lightning storm were meant to distract and ultimately pull the audience away from the film as it did for me.

The rest of the cast in this film served mostly as bookends and I think it would be unfair to expect any of the characters they portrayed to stand out in the way that Franco did. It was nice to see Amber Tamblyn (Sister Hood of the Traveling pants, Joan of Arcadia) in a film again. This is a fantastic Film I give it {{{4.5 out 5}}}

She said:

As James said, much like The Way Back or Buried this certainly isn't a film you would want to watch repeatedly. There were too many conflicts going on in my mind during the film that I couldn't deal with over and over! It is the only film I have seen that has given a sense of both claustrophobia and agoraphobia at the same time. It also made me want to become a canyoneer and never become a canyoneer at the same time.

The overall structure of the film was good. The first part of the film builds up Aron's personality a cocky thrill seeker, which creates a nice contrast when he becomes stuck and helpless. I would have liked a bit more of this vulnerability to come out throughout the 127 hours though as I think Danny Boyle verged on overkill with hallucinations and delusions.

I felt that there could have been more nods towards the time passing. Although Aron looks at his watch constantly I don't think I really understood how long the time felt to him. This is not to the detriment of James Franco's acting I should point out; he gave a stella performance in an intense and very much a solo role. The vast range of emotions Aron went through was well played and Franco drew you in and held your attention.

I really enjoyed this film although there were a few qualms. However it was a thrilling and astonishing story of human endurance and it is not one to be missed. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said: This is a film that never loses momentum and constantly tightens it's grip on the audience. Easily a must see film. We give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

Question of the day: Do you enjoy films inspired by real events or do you prefer your films to be solid fiction?

THE FOLLOWING LINKS ARE ABOUT THE TRUE STORY AND THEREFORE CONTAIN SPOILERS:

Aron Ralston's Blog

Video one year later

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

She said: Best films of 2010

2011-01-07T13:00:00.008Z

QUESTION 1: What were the best films of 2010?
QUESTION 2: What were the most overrated films of 2010?

She Said's most overrated films:

Sherlock Holmes.

I know I am going to get into trouble for saying this but I thought it was dreadful. Not only did I fall asleep, which I have only ever done twice or thrice at most ever, but it was just like watching something British being battered with the Hollywood sign. I am not saying this because I am a big Arthur Conan Doyle fan - to be honest if I had never heard of Sherlock Holmes before I still would have thought the film was overrated. Now please don't hurt me.

Click here for our review.

Megamind.

Now, don't get me wrong - I really enjoyed this film. But it was extrememly overrated. There is a trend with big animated films with huge stars in. The marketing teams tend to repeatedly hold up a sign in front of you for months saying "YOU WILL LOVE THIS - IT IS HILARIOUS" that when it comes to the actual film there is big anti-climax. Plus I hate Jonah Hill. Shiver.

Click here for our review.

Legends of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole.

I fell asleep during this film as well. Yawny-McYawnerson. It could have done with being about forty minutes shorter. I was expecting big things from this. It had a title theme by 30 Seconds to Mars for Gandalf's sake. But alas. It just 'weren't all that'.

Click here for our review.

Clash of the Titans.

Not worth the 3D and, to be quite honest, I put it on par with Percy Jackson. If not slightly behind. I can't really remember much about the film - always a bad sign when the film was supposed to be a blockbuster hit. Same goes for Robin Hood, the third film I fell asleep through this year.

Click here for our review.

See you at the movies!

The Way Back

2011-01-06T15:50:00.006Z

Directed by: Peter Weir
UK release: 24 December 2010
US release: 11 January 2011 (limited)
Starring: Jim Sturgess, Ed Harris, Colin Farrell, Mark Strong, Saoirse Ronan

IMDB page

She said:

I am not sure I was fully prepared for how epic this film was. And boy, was it epic in every sense of the word. You see James and I had originally intended to watch Burlesque but, due to the cinema being stupid, that film had been taken off a day early for some Russell Crowe film preview (The Next Three Days) . So we decided to see The Way Back, and despite being as far removed as possible from the glitz and glam of a musical I for one am really glad we saw it.

It is a talent to make a film such as this I think; a film that is so long, extreme and unforgiving without ever boring the audience. In fact this was exactly what the film needed to keep the audience gripped. There was very little music emphasising the vastness, the solitude and isolation of the group of fugitives. It's a cliche but I felt like I was on this journey with them - I even felt thirsty when they were in the desert!

My only real gripe with the film was that some parts were almost skipped over. Yes, I felt that a run time of 133 minutes was not enough. I guess it is testament to the pacing of the film that I didn't get board after the first 1000 miles. This would have made a really interesting television series, but then of course no one would take on a TV show with that big a budget... well maybe Fox, but they'd only cancel it at season 2.

Better than I was expecting and fantastically made (Oscar nomination perhaps) but not the sort of film I'd watch over and over. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said
Every once in a while a film takes me completely by surprise. Helen and I have seen nearly two hundred films in the past year and a half and I can count on one hand how many completely took my breath away. I am happy to say that The Way Back is that type of film.

Director Peter Weir has been more or less absent from the public eye over the last seven years, Master and Commander was released nearly 8 years ago and the much better known Truman show was released five years before that. Weir has proven here that his ability to tell an epic story is as finely honed as ever.

While I do think that Weir deserves a Best Director Oscar nod at the very least I really don't feel that any of the actors stood out any more than their costars. The film is completely believable from start to finish but I can't think of any one moment where I thought Oscar performance. It is a compliment to all of the actors that I never struggled to believe their characters reality.

This is a film worth seeing in theatres as the setting and locations are as beautiful as they are epic, but as Helen has said above The Way Back is not a film that invokes an impulse to watch it again any time soon. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:
We both secretly hope that there will be an extended version released when this film hits DVD as there are a few portions that seem to be completely missing from the theatrical version. This is a wonderful and epic film about the journey of seven men that chose to risk dying free instead of living as prisoners. We give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT 'TRUE STORY' INSPIRED FILM IS YOUR FAVOURITE?

Most Anticipated films of 2011

2011-01-05T15:54:00.005Z

He said:

We have just posted the video below on our Youtube Channel. The trailer below it is James' most anticipated film of 2011.

Source Code Trailer

She said:
Helen's video of her favorite films of 2010 should be up soon!

Question of the Day: What is your most anticipated film of the year?

Video killed the radio stars

2011-01-02T17:16:00.007Z

So you may or may not know that He Said She Said is currently on hiatus from the radio waves. But never fear, because we are branching out into the world of Youtube. A world where James and I feel at home, a world that we love. Today we posted our first ever He Said She Said video where we discuss who we are, what we'll be doing on the channel and, most importantly, how YOU can get involved.

We are really excited for the future and can't wait for you guys to be a part of it. Watch our video below and don't forget to answer our questions of the day:

1) What is your favourite film of 2010 and why?
2) What film are you looking forward to in 2011?

Our answers are below!

She said:

1) One of my favourite films of 2010 was probably Scott Pilgrim vs the World (in fact I am considering cosplaying Roxie Richter at a con we're going to this year). I found this film completely unique with its gaming crossover. It was something fresh to the comic/gaming film genre that I felt was becoming a bit stagnant.

2) I am, of course, most looking forward to the last ever installment of Harry Potter. Because... well... it's Harry Potter!

He said:

1) There were so many great films in 2010 that I struggled picking just one. I think Toy Story 3 stands out near the top if for no other reason than the emotional climax in that film. These characters that we have gotten to know so well over the last 15 years have become so much more than toys to a lot of us; that it is no surprise how many countless people left the theatres discreetly drying their eyes.

2) The film I am most looking forward to in 2011 is The Green Lantern, Hal Jordan is one of the few DC characters that sparks my interests and I am looking forward to what could be a franchise with Star Warsian scope. Yes I went there.

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader {3D}

2011-01-02T14:28:00.006Z

Directed by: Michael Apted
UK release date: 9 December 2010
US release date: 10 December 2010
Starring: Georgie Henley, Skandar Keynes, Will Poulter, Ben Barnes

IMDB Page

She said:

I grew up with the BBC adaptations of The Chronicles of Narnia and love the idea of this fantasy world you can be pulled into. It is the ultimate escapism, and this film is also the ultimate adventure, sailing the seas, visiting new lands and experiencing new magics. I loved it.

Dawn Treader was always one of my favourites in the series because it has the introduction of Eustace Scrubb (fantastic name). Will Poulter (from Son of Rambow which, by the way, is a great film) plays Eustace and gets the balance between annoying, funny and likeable just right.

As always with the Narnia films the great special effects manage to compensate for the less than perfect acting skills of some the cast. I think this is my favourite of the Narnia films so far and I keep my fingers crossed for The Silver Chair... of course that film won't be the same with the BBC adaptation's Tom Baker. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

He said:
There are very few novel to film adaptations that make me as nervous as this franchise. I have loved the Chronicles of Narnia for nearly my entire life. This series of books were the first actual books I can remember reading and comprehending as a child and to this day I use characters from the book in my online presence.

When I was younger the Voyage of the Dawn Treader was the adventure that I wanted to be a part of the most. The Chronicles are C.S. Lewis' loose adaptation of the Bibles New Testament as well as his attempt to create a world similar to the one created by fellow author and close friend J.R.R. Tolkien.

To say that each of these films have made me nervous is unfair, while I was nervous before I had seen them I have been pleasantly surprised by each film. While they have taken many liberties, some more subtle than others the over all feel of each film manages to completely encompass Lewis' original works.

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is a fantastic film that unfortunately felt the need to jump on the recent 3D bandwagon that seems to have infected the majority of the film industry over the last few years. To say the 3D was unnecessary seems to much of an understatement, this is an epic telling of an epic journey it did not need the less than epic 3D treatment. {{{I give it 3 out of 5}}}

They said:

A wonderful family film, we suggest you see the 2D version and save the extra money for the Popcorn, drinks and sweets! [[[We give it 6 out of 10]]]

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT IS YOUR FAVOURITE IMAGINARY WORLD?

Love and Other Drugs

2011-01-02T14:22:00.011Z

Directed by: Edward Zwick
UK release date: 29 December 2010
US release date: 24 November 2010
Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Anne Hathaway, Oliver Platt, Hank Azaria

IMDB Page

He said:
Before I review this film it should be known that I am more or less in love with Anne Hathaway and the fact that she seems to be naked in nearly a third of this film is never ever going to be a reason for me to complain.

This is a fun romantic comedy with great heart and an excellent amount of humor. In my opinion Hathaway and Gyllenhaal share an onscreen chemistry to rival that of Bogart and Bergman in Casablanca. Oliver Platt is fantastic throughout this film managing to steal nearly every scene he shares with Gyllenhaal.

Love and other drugs is a large departure for director Ed Zwick who is better known for films like Blood Diamond and The Siege but also produced the Television show My so called life with Claire Danes that launched her career. Though it is not his typical project he crafted a fantastic and well paced film.

Love and other drugs is a fun film that has enough humor and nudity to make it a favorite of most couples for a number of years to come. {{{I give it 4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I hadn't heard much about this film so wasn't sure what to expect. I didn't expect a whole load of sex and nakedness for example, but hey, who's complaining? The basic premise of the film i.e. a relationship between a pharmaceutical rep and an artist with early on-set Parkinson's, was a really thought provoking one.

For me this film was ultimately about having to accept yourself to accept someone else. I won't go into detail but there were some parallels to mine and James' relationship in this way. Perhaps this is why I 'got' this film whereas some people might miss that deeper meaning.

There were some great comedic moments in this film (selling Viagra, for example) and some great tear jerking moments (but that would be telling). Overall it was a really interesting film with, as previously mentioned, a lot of nakedness. I give it {{{3 out of 5}}}

They said:

A funny and heartwarming film about acceptance and life. Just don't see it with your mum. We give this film {{{7 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT WAS THE LAST FILM THAT MADE YOU CRY?

Tron: Legacy {3D}

2011-01-02T14:08:00.009Z

Directed by: Joseph Kosinski
UK/US Release date: 17 December 2010
Starring: Jeff Bridges, Garrett Hedlund, Bruce Boxleitner, Olivia Wilde

IMDB Page

She said:

We were lucky enough to have seen the original 1982 Tron film just a few weeks before we saw Tron: Legacy giving us a good expectation of what to expect from this sequel. Like its predecessor Tron: Legacy is something completely fresh, original and exciting. In a nutshell, I loved it.

The thing that most impressed me is the faithfulness to the original 1982 look while still managing to make it cutting edge for 2010. The architecture and design of the computer world remained very similar while the look was updated (the movie posters are a good example of this):

I also enjoyed watching a 3D film that was actually worth the stress of trying to keep the annoying glasses on over my own. As you know He Said She Said are not big 3D fans but this one is a must. There is a not-to-be-missed 'Wizard of Oz' moment as the 2D human worlds turns into the 3D computer world.

Overall I expected quite a lot and I wasn't disappointed. I felt there were some parts in the middle - such as a computer world nightclub - that seemed to deviate a bit from the core story but were still enjoyable. Similarly I felt the original film had a stronger sense of the world being an actual computer system with specific programs... but then I guess computers were a bit simpler 30 years ago.

I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:
Let me be completely honest from the word go this is not a film you go to see for its intricate plot devices, this is a film that promises and delivers eye candy and that is the reason I was excited to see it in the first place.

The general idea behind this franchise is brilliant and I enjoyed this film from start to finish. My only real complaint is with the CGI Jeff Bridges that looks amazing and life like as long as he isn't speaking. The character of CLU scratched that part of my brain that struggles with suspension of disbelief and never let it relax.

To be honest if the entire world hadn't been completely over saturated with the media presence and anticipation behind this film I really think it would have gotten as many negative reviews. It is not a groundbreaking state of the art film like its predecessor but it is with out a doubt a breathtaking adventure.

This is a fun film that is more than worth the price of admission and I have yet to speak to anyone that has seen the film that hasn't enjoyed it. I give this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

They said:
A family friendly film that should be seen on the big screen before you own it on DVD or BluRay. We give this film [[[8.5 out of 10]]]

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: HAVE YOU SEEN THE ORIGINAL TRON?

Monsters

2010-12-20T22:04:00.005Z

Directed by: Gareth Edwards
UK release: 03 Dec 2010
US release: 24 Sept 2010 (video on demand)
Starring (voices): Whitney Able and Scoot McNairy

IMDB Page

He said:
One of the biggest advantages moving to the UK has granted me (aside from being closer to my wife.) is the exposure to small independent films such as Monster in cinema. I have enjoyed independent films for a long time and my DVD collection reflects that, but I very rarely get a chance to experience these films in the cinema. More often than not they have a limited release and I have to rely on a renting service in order to enjoy them

Monsters is a very different film than advertised but in the best way imaginable. It is a film about two people trying to make it home in the center of a long gestating alien invasion. Gareth Edwards used every red cent of his 800,000 dollar budget and made good use of it, a lesson that quite a few blockbuster film makers would do quite well to learn.

This is an excellent film that really only suffers from running about 10 minutes longer than necessary, with out giving anything away I can say if the credits would have rolled just ten minutes sooner I would have given it a slightly better score. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

I am always intrigued to see independent films that make it to widespread cinema release and this film was no exception. This film was made with a cast of two people (extras were people who happened to be on location) and an onset crew of two people, with a total budget of $800,000. Considering all this Monsters is an absolutely phenomenal achievement in special and visual effects and film making.

This simple story about two people trying to get home amidst a backdrop of an alien 'occupation' was not as scary as I expected it to be from the trailer and it actually presents much more as a drama. However this wasn't to its detriment at all, in fact I enjoyed the more subtle, political edge to this film. It was interesting that Gareth Edwards chose northern Mexico, for example, as the infected zone made which I felt made a comment on U.S. immigration.

There were things that I wished the film has developed more such as the male lead's occupation as a photographer however there were other parts that I wish they hadn't developed. I think this film would be much better by chopping off the last 20 minutes which to me seemed unnecessary and pandering to a Hollywood audience (perhaps why it reached cinemas in the first place though!)

I really enjoyed this film. The two actors played their parts well considering they could have easily gone down the heavy-breathing Blair Witch snot on the camera style of acting that may have ruined the film. Instead they gave the story realism, which is always an achievement for sci-fi films. Not perfect but definitely worth a watch! I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:

A great film and we suggest that you search it out if not while it is in cinema or ON Demand you should look for it when it hits DVD. We give it {{{7 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: Do you believe in aliens? or Are we alone in the universe?

Megamind {2D}

2010-12-09T19:08:00.007Z

Directed by: Tom McGrath
UK release: 03 Dec 2010
US release: 07 Nov 2010
Starring (voices): Will Ferrell, Brad Pitt, Tina Fey, Jonah Hill, David Cross

IMDB Page

She said:

Megamind was always set to be a big hit with stars like Brad Pitt and Will Ferrell but I have to admit I found it a little disappointing. Don't get me wrong, this is a very funny film and I laughed right till the end, but there was just something missing - it didn't have the same edge achieved by other CGI animated films like Shrek or Despicable Me.

This film did something that really annoys me; it put all of the funniest moment in the trailer thus leaving you inevitably disappointed at the funny-but-not-as-funny moments in the rest of the film. Of course commercially this works fantastically growing maximum expectation for the film which generates mega-sales (no matter what you think of it they already have your cash!). But taking of my cynical hat for a moment I think this is a great family film which all the family can enjoy.

The story is one that I am sure everyone can identify with of someone who seeks negative attention because it is better than no attention. A fish out of water if you like (which is funny because his sidekick is a fish on a robot body) simply trying to fit in... but with varying amounts of success.

If anyone here listens to our radio shows you will know I can't stand Jonah Hill. Luckily in this film they didn't seem to let him do too much ad-libbing (huzzah) but I think his character was a bit pointless. There were other parts of the story which I would have like to seen explored further - I won't say what because we don't do spoilers - so I felt that the Jonah Hill storyline stretched out the film a bit and was a bit wearing as it went on. However overall a good one to go see. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

He said:
As Helen mentions above Megamind's biggest fault is that the best jokes of the film were included in the trailer and the remaining jokes were largely hit and miss. I often find myself in a difficult and unmotivated place when I have to write reviews for films that I don't have a strong opinion of either way, and Megamind is one of those films.

This is yet another film that lost absolutely nothing in 2D. Dreamworks studios has once again proven that they are at the very least on par with Pixar's animation studio. It does seem that both studios struggle to create believable human looking human characters though they seem to have no problem anthropomorphizing plants and animals.

With one exception I really felt that each character was independent of the actor portraying them. The exception being Titan (Jonah Hill) for some reason the animators decided to animate a remarkably close likeness of the actor instead of creating a new character.

Considering Jonah Hill's live action roles all seem to be "Jonah Hill in random situation" (with the exception of Get him to the Greek, by far Hill's best performance to date in my opinion.) It seems to me it would have been in his best interest to jump at the chance to slip into a different skin. Minor complaints aside this is a fun film and younger audiences will enjoy it. I give it {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:
As per usual when given the opportunity we screened the 2D version and can safely say once again that we were not cheated by the experience. Save the extra cash for the concession stands. [[[We give it 6.5 out of 10]]]

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: DREAMWORKS OR PIXAR?

Unstoppable

2010-12-06T16:03:00.004Z

Directed by: Tony Scott
UK release: 24 Nov 2010
US release: 12 Nov 2010
Starring: Denzel Washington, Chris Pine, Rosario Dawson, Ethan Suplee, Kevin Dunn

IMDB Page

He said:

I have been waiting for this film for nearly six months. I have to admit the first time I saw the trailer I rolled my eyes at the plot, but Denzel Washington and Tony Scott are a fantastic team and if you forgive the pun have a decent 'track' record. Denzel has proven here with out a doubt that he still has what it takes to headline an action film.

Tony Scott is truly gifted at making a tense and edge of your seat thriller. The overall concept of the film could have very easily been dull in less skilled hands. If you have reservations about this film you can set them aside this is an action packed well paced thrill ride from start to finish.

Chris Pine does an excellent job slipping into the Will Coulson character, and vanishes in the role. I read a few articles on different review sites that mentioned more than once that they weren't convinced that Pine could stand alongside Washington or portray anyone other than the new and improved James T. Kirk, rest assured this is an actor with talent in spades.

I always enjoy films like these for the simple reason that they are a bit ridiculous. This is a fun film that takes you along for the ride and re-introduces you to the edge of your seat. There are far to few films that are this fun from the word go. I gave this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

Sometimes when you go to the cinema you don't want something which is too patronising but then again you don't want to think to much and you are just in a wishy-washy mood. Face it - it happens. I feel that films like Unstoppable come into their own. It is a great skill to find that balance in Hollywood with just a few too many violins edging you into a crying wreck or too many jump cuts blurring up your head. Without wanting to sound like a stereotypical reviewer; this film has suspense, action, drama and emotion all rolled into one thrill ride.

Unlike James I had not heard of this film until I saw the poster in the cinema - in fact I never even saw the trailer - so I had no preconceptions apart from the fact that the title and tagline made me think of Speed. Much like Speed this film kept me on the edge of my seat but in a very different way. Unstoppable didn't feel the need to throw in massive set pieces and ridiculous effects willy-nilly, rather it kept people's attention by building the relationships between the characters first and then picked up speed in a non-rushed, steady way (much like a train as it pulls out of the station).

Denzel Washington and Chris Pine are both great actors. They reflect the seriousness of the event but also add a lighter side into their relationship. I was also very impressed by Rosario Dawson, who played the manager of the train depot, and the way she came into her own in an almost David and Goliath battle against top bod Kevin Dunn.

I really recommend this film and urge you to go and see it. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:

Based on a true story this well-paced story of a runaway train will keep you glued until the last frame. We are positive this is a crowd-pleaser and caters to most tastes. We give it {{{8.5 out of 10}}}.

Question for the comments: Do you have a favorite Denzel Washington film?

RED

2010-11-26T23:06:00.005Z

Directed by: Robert Schwentke
U.K. Release: 22 October 2010
U.S. Release: 15 October 2010
Starring: Morgan Freeman, Bruce Willis, John Malkovich, Mary Louise Parker, Helen Mirren, Karl Urban

IMDB Page

She said:

If you are one of those people who finds it tough to suspend their disbelief then this might be a film to avoid (but then again you should probably avoid all action films all together!). This film is topped to the brim with dangerous exploits and, while I may have some reservations, I haven't seen a good ol' "how many rounds can we get through in one scene" action film in some time so for me - this was quite a fun one.

My only real issue with RED was that the cast and crew clearly got carried away with the theme of old age pensioners jaunting off with machine guns on one more quest before biting the bullet (well... one more quest until the sequel of course). I have a sense of humour and I understand the comedy in seeing Helen Mirren talking about being a CIA assassin but I think they went overboard. It is a clear joke that didn't need to be flashed in our eyes with big ol' neon lights.

The film had a fantastic mix of actors. I wasn't convinced that Bruce Willis and Mary Louise Parker could pull of a romantic relationship but I actually think I was wrong! Karl Urban was fantastic as the current CIA agent trying to stop the oldies in their tracks. I would be surprised if he wasn't back in a sequel.

Before I give my score I have to admit my personal revulsion to guns is probably skewing it quite a bit because overall I did enjoy this film and would probably watch it again. I give it {{{2.5 out of 5}}}

He said:
Every now and again it does this film goers soul good to sit down and enjoy a completely nonsensical film. RED fits that bill to the T. Much like this summer's 80's Action hero throw back-Expendables there are a ton of familiar faces that quite often steal rather than share the limelight as they do here.

The cast all shared a chemistry and embraced the ridiculousness that was the plot of this graphic novel adaptation. This is a fun film that you would be hard pressed to not at least chuckle at the complete absurdity of a bunch of senior citizens with a License to Kill and the firepower required to do just that.

Karl Urban (2009's Star Trek's Bones Macoy) and Mary Louise Parker (best known for her role as Nancy Botwin on Showtime's Weeds) both do a fantastic job taking the baton from the previous generations headliners. I really enjoyed this film I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

They said: Obviously there is a lot of foul language and a sizable helping of gun violence that not all families want to expose their children to; but over all this is a fun film and worth renting at the very least. We give it {{{6.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: SO TELL US REALLY... HAVE YOU EVER FANTASIZED ABOUT BEING A SECRET AGENT?

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part 1)

2010-11-20T17:34:00.005Z

SPOILER FREE

Directed by: David Yates
UK/US release: 19 November 2010
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, Ralph Fiennes, Helena Bonham Carter, Imelda Staunton

IMDB page

She said:

Readers of He said she said may not know this but I am a HUGE Harry Potter fan. I read the first book when I was 11 (that is 13 years ago now) and haven't shut up about how amazing the story is since. The thing that makes the series so fantastic is the depth and intelligence of the story itself and on the whole I think that Deathly Hallows Part One conveyed this well.

I have read very mixed reviews of this second-to-last installment of HP and I am not surprised at some of the more adverse reactions from non-readers. Deathly Hallows is the darkest book and, for the first time, we are taken away from the warmth and familiarity of Hogwarts and thrown into the unknown. This is the trio at war with a corrupt and oppressed wizarding world. In terms of tone and feel I think the film got this spot on; there is a very grey light throughout, perfectly conveying a sombre and very serious nature to this tale.

The best thing about the film for me was the development of Harry, Ron and Hermione. You really get a sense that both the actors and characters have matured a great deal. For example Emma Watson's eyebrows are much tamer in this film and there is a lot less sighing and a lot more emotional depth to her performance. I felt she was understated (which is perfect for Hermione in this installment) and was really the glue that held everything together. Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint also gave their best performances both very gently adding moments of tenderness and humour to this otherwise dark film.

I could go into a lot more detail including comparisons to the book but for He said she said I think I have said what I need to. This film is, in my opinion, the best made in the series. There is also a part which takes us away from the traditional style of the films into something all together different - but I won't tell you what! I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}} - the extra 0.5 is being held back until I can judge Part One and Two together!

He said:

Unlike my wife and so many other fans of Harry Potter I did not grow up with Harry. I was first introduced to the wizarding world at the less than tender age of 22, while stationed in Germany with the US Army. I tore through the first four years of the series in a matter of three days with little of my attention anywhere other than Hogwarts. I have read all seven books and even enjoy the genre of music (commonly known as WROCK or Wizard ROCK.) I have seen each film with in the first week of it's release and have enjoyed each for the similar but very different stories they tell.

The Deathly Hallows part 1 is a fantastic adaptation of the novel. While there are scenes that I had pictured differently in my head they were much more familiar than a lot of the previous films altogether. As Helen says above the tone and even look of this film is the darkest of the series thus far. I think this choice by Yates and his production team reflects their respect for both the source material and the audience.

It has been nearly ten years since the first film was released world wide and the majority of the fans of that film have grown up along with these characters and films. Deathly Hallows is not the quintessential children film franchise it was nearly ten years ago. I think quite a few parents who still associate Harry Potter with their eleven year old children will be in for quite a shock when they discover not only has the cast matured so to has the material.

I really enjoyed this film and like Helen I am eager to rate both parts together this summer. I can not recommend this film enough, I give it [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

They said:

Despite being the darkest film in the series this also has some of the most heartwarming and giggle-worthy scenes of all the movies so far. Don't expect classroom high-jinx, jolly music and fireside chats in the Gryffindor common room but do expect to be blown away by a dangerous and lonely quest to defeat Lord Voldemort. We give this film {{{9 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: Go on then.... are you a Harry Potter fan?

Burke & Hare

2010-11-18T15:10:00.006Z

Directed by: John Landis
UK release date: 29 October 2010
Starring: Simon Pegg, Andy Serkis, Isla Fisher, Tom Wilkinson, Tim Curry, Jessica Hynes, Ronnie Corbett

IMDB page

She said:

I was slightly worried when I first saw the trailer for this film that it would slip from comedy into an unfunny ridiculously vulgar spectacle. Upon seeing the film I can conclude that it did indeed slip into a ridiculously vulgar spectacle - it was never, however, unfunny. In fact I haven't enjoyed a good film like this in a long time; a fantastic array of British actors finding a balance between great storytelling, some old fashioned slapstick and moments of Monty Python-esque humour.

I can vaguely remember learning about the Burke and Hare murders back in school and when you know its based in truth the film automatically became a black comedy. It not only is a comment on the opportunism of the early 19th century (the Industrial Revolution about to tip capitalist society into overdrive) but also on the sacrifices made for the advances of medicine. Plus it is fun to see the fictional embellishments added on to make it less unseemly and more downright funny.

All of the actors in this film were superb and the chemistry between Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis made you feel like they have been parading as a comedy duo for years. The supporting cast (which was vast) all played their parts exceptionally and the film never lost pace or direction. I don't often love broad comedy but this is definitely one I'll be adding to my DVD collection. I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said: This is a fantastic film based on a true story that is almost too much fun to keep true to it's source material. Pegg and Serkis are completely in their element from start to finish and the film never feels forced or tired. There were a few scenes that made me laugh loud enough that Helen had to quiet me down.

Isla Fisher and Jessica Hynes shared very few scenes together but both actress nearly stole every scene they were in and were both fantastic and energetic as Burke's love interest and Hare's wife respectively. Like many other British films of late Burke & Hare manage to shoe horn in their fair share of well known British celebrities at every turn, though to director Landis' credit the cameos never feel forced or out of place.

This is a fun film that had great pacing and wonderful heart, the fact that you might actually learn a thing or two about nineteenth century medicine and the culture surrounding it in Edinburgh, Scotland in 1826 is just a further testament of the films over all entertainment value. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: This film is sublimely crass, disgusting and ridiculous but in the most fantastic of ways. This really isn't a film to get too snobby or critical about - its a joy-filled romp that is solely meant to entertain. We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: What is the last film you went to see that genuinely made you laugh out loud?

Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole

2010-11-17T11:27:00.005Z

Directed by Zack Snyder
Starring Helen Mirren, Hugo Weaving, Jim Sturgess, Geoffery Rush, Sam Neil

IMDB LINK

He said:

If I am completely honest I have very little to say about this film. It wasn't a terrible film, and the animation was absolutely stunning. I honestly think if the concept had been so far fetched, I might have almost convinced myself that this was a live action film instead of a computer generated one.

This film is a bit more violent than I thought was appropriate for a film aimed at an audience of pre adolescent children. This is a Zack Snyder film, and it has his signature on nearly every battle scene, of which there are many.

The real issue I have with this film is that though it had a fair amount of action, the pace never seemed to pick up. I don't think this is a bad film, it just really wasn't one that I enjoyed. I give this film {{{2 out of 5}}}

She said:

My views on this film are pretty similar to what James has already said. I felt myself a little disappointed at the end of the film that it didn't quite live up to expectations. I can't really place my finger on what the problem was but the makers just didn't quite pull it off. The story wasn't bad and gives scope for sequels but I think they tried to complicate something that should have been simple.

The animation was the film's saving grace. If you are a fan of the art behind computer animation then you will really appreciated this film. The owls were fantastic and, as James said, they were so lifelike they could have been the real thing. It is a marvel how animation has developed over the last 15 years - if you said to the creators of Toy Story back in 1995 to create a programme for owl feathers in torrential rain they would probably run away screaming.

I have to admit that I fell asleep during this film, which I don't often do. I am taking that as a sign it is a tad on the lengthy side. I wouldn't mind watching it again on DVD but I won't be rushing out to the shops to pre-order just yet. I give this film {{{2.5 out of 5}}}

They said:
We both agree that despite the fantastic artwork this film left us rather disinterested by the final frame. Probably worth a watch but not to be raved over, we give this film {{{4.5 out of 10}}}

Question time: Have you seen a film that left you feeling lukewarm recently? Tell us about it in the comments!

SAW 3D

2010-11-03T13:48:00.004Z

Director: Kevin Greutert
UK and US release: 29 October 2010
Starring: Cary Elwes, Tobin Bell, Costas Mandylor

He said:

I can honestly say that this is one horror franchise that I haven't grown tired of as quickly as I have some others in the genre (take the Halloween franchise for example). The Jigsaw character when he was first introduced was something completely different in the world of horror, his intent was never to kill you but to make you see the value of your life.

The first two films repeated the subtle yet brillant chilling fact about John Kramer; the franchise depicts Jigsaw as the most notorious serial killer that never actually kills anyone. The idea that these victims might escape if they are willing to endure what ever physical torment is set before them is really an awesome if not terrifying concept.

SAW 3D much like Piranha 3D before it was a fun film that benefited from its overt gore and the necessity to throw said gore at its audience. This is not a franchise that is seeking accolades, this is a franchise seeking to entertain, what more can you ask for?

This will not be a film of the year, nor will it be in the top 5 film at the box office receipts next weekend, this is a film that is tailor made for the Halloween weekend for adults with out children that would temselves like a chance to Trick or Treat I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

She said:

As James said the thing that made the early Saw films stand out was the fact that John Kramer was playing a game in which people could survive if they really want it enough. This gave the films a moral edge... although don't get me wrong - he does some crazy-ass crap tantamount to murder!

My issue with the franchise as it went on is that it lost this grounding and turned more into a "how much gore can we fit in 2 hours". I think this 'last' Saw film was the worst culprit of this changing it from a sadistic game to a murderous bloodbath.

As they moved away from Kramer's motives we have also moved away from the simple, yet effective plot of film one. While I enjoyed many of the plot elements in Saw 3D, especially with cameos from previous victims of Jigsaw, I felt that they should have moved further away from the original story; next time either make a film with the true Jigsaw game or make something completely detached.

Saying all this of course I thoroughly enjoyed this film with lots of blood, guts and more! I was, however, a tad disappointed with a lacklustre opening and I think they could have gone further with the 3D elements. But then overall, as James said, this is meant to be pure entertainment and hasn't been made to win a Best Film Oscar. I give it {{{2.5 out of 5}}}

They said:

This is a fun franchise that we enjoyed watching back to back. We recommend the series to watch if you are a fan of horror. If we were rating the whole franchise our scores would definately go up with the original film being the best.

At the very least SAW 3D is worth renting and we give this 'final installment' {{{5.5 out of 10}}}

Question of the Day: Have you seen our SAW adaptation? What do you think!

Despicable Me 3D

2010-10-22T14:56:00.010+01:00

Director: Pierre Coffin and Chris Renaud
UK release: 15 Oct 2010
US release: 9 July 2010
Starring: Steve Carell, Jason Segel, Russell Brand, Julie Andrews, Miranda Cosgrove, Dana Gaier, Elsie Fisher, Kristen Wiig

IMDB Page

She said:

The first I knew about this film was when I was in the US this summer, where Despicable Me characters adorned the walls of every IHOP restaurant I visited. I was instantly intrigued by these bean-like yellow aliens with big grins and funny goggles and knew that this was a film that would make me 'awww' a ridiculous amount. This prediction turned out to be true.

In fact not only did I 'aww' but I also had a tear in my eye at some points and of course a LOT of laughs throughout. I know it sounds cliched but this really is a film for all the family, with enough jokes and visual gags to keep both children and adults engaged and entertained.

I am trying hard to think of what I did not enjoy and I find myself unable to fault this film. The voice acting and character development was especially well done for an animated film. I highly enjoyed Agnes who is the youngest child and by far one of the funniest animated characters of the year.

I really have not laughed this much at a film for a long time - it was almost therapeutic. Please see this film. I give it {{{5 out of 5}}}

He said:
I have seen this film three times in cinema, and I have walked out of the theatre smiling and still laughing with each viewing. I seem to find something new each time I see the film.

The first teaser trailers for this film (The silhouette of Carrel's Character Gru) did not do it justice, highlighting the least imaginative of the films vast array of individual entertaining characters.

Fans of this film will be happy to note that the uber-popular minion characters currently have an animated series already in development with Cartoon Network. If nothing else Illumination Entertainment studios has stumbled upon a cash cow with many lucrative opportunities.

This is a fun film that will definitely find itself on many DVD shelves this holiday season. I absolutely suggest this film to anyone in the need of a fun and happy family friendly film. I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

They said:

This film is well paced with a great balance between comedy and heart. This is a great first feature film from Illumination Entertainment and we expect great things from them in the future. We give this film {{{9.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHO IS YOUR FAVOURITE EVIL-VILLAIN-WITH-A-HEART?

The Social Network

2010-10-21T16:37:00.006+01:00

Directed by David Fincher

Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Armie Hammer, Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake

IMDB LINK

He said:

This is a fantastic creation of a film though based in fact has a love affair with fiction (Zuckerberg mentioned in one interview that while most events in the film are fictitious he does own all of the shirts Eisenberg wears in the film.)

This film has received countless positive reviews and having finally seen it, it is not at all surprising. The actor that stood out to me the most was Andrew Garfield. Those Spider-Man fans that were initially concerned about a British actor playing Peter Parker will be able to sigh in relief at his convincing American accent.

Fans of David Fincher will notice a much more subtle approach to the adaption then in former fan favorites like Fight Club and Se7en. With The Social Network Fincher helmed a fantastic film truly expressing his talent.

This is a film about an idea, a friendship and eventually the betrayal of the latter to serve the former. I think the emotions in this film are handled very convincingly and over all this is a superb film I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

The Social Network has been hailed as 'the film of a generation' by some critics and, having now seen the film, I agree; while youths of the sixties discovered drugs and free love, teenagers of today are discovering a world of knowledge and entertainment right in their own homes. And some people who were once called 'nerdy' (like Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg) have taken this culture and cashed in on it.

The film itself was a great portrayal of the story of how Facebook came about although, as James says, I don't think fidelity was top of The Social Network's list of priorities. However, despite not being that accurate in its adaptation, I don't think this hindered the film. Personally if I had wanted the absolute truth I probably would have been disappointed by what I got! In fact diverging from the truth allowed screenwriter Aaron Sorkin to inject pure entertainment value into this movie.

The stand out performances were Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg and Andrew Garfield as Facebook cofounder Eduardo Saverin. One performance I didn't enjoy was Justin Timberlake as Napster creator Sean Parker because I found myself just wanting to punch him... although then again I think that was kind of the point! Armie Hammer also stood out as both of the Winkelvoss twins which, by the way, showed off some fantastic special effects.

I highly recommend this film because whether you take what you see as the truth or as total fiction you are bound to enjoy the film. There are characters you'll hate, characters you'll love and characters you'll feel pretty sorry for. If you think you are part of the 'internet generation' I mentioned then do yourself a favour and give this film a go. I give this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

They said: While the history of how an elite university website came to dominate social networking worldwide may not strike the average passerby as a must see film, this film has an excellent narrative and is well worth your time. We give it [[[?? out of 10]]]

Question of the day: Facebook has clawed its way to the top of the social network mountain, does anyone still have an active Myspace account?

The Death and Life of Charlie St. Cloud

2010-10-19T15:16:00.005+01:00

Director: Burr Steers
UK release: 8 Oct 2010
US release: 30 July 2010
Starring: Zac Efron, Charlie Tahan, Amanda Crew, Augustus Prew, Donal Logue, Kim Basinger, Ray Liotta

IMDB LINK

He said:

Charlie St. Cloud strikes me as a love it or leave it type of film. This film is ripe with romance, humor and loss. I found myself straining to hear actual dialogue over the score of the film, which being the mature reviewer that I am, will blame completely on Rolfe Kent, the man credited with creating all of the films music.

There are a few scenes in this film that really felt genuinely new and beautiful. There is a scene of two of the characters running through the graveyard with a single candle between them that is really a touching moment in a film chock full of heart. One of my few complaints in the film is how there hardly any explanation of the cause of Sam's death, and it's generally assumed to be his brother's fault.

There were a couple of scenes that I felt muddled the already slow moving story, though through Efron's acting the film is redeemed. Efron has proven that he is much more than just a pretty face and is with out a doubt a force to be reckoned with.

There are two other performances that stand out in Charlie St. Cloud, Kim Basinger and Ray Liotta, though their respective roles are really more uber-cameos than supporting roles both actors put their hearts into this film.

As the credits rolled at the end of this film, I realized that while it will not be the best film I have seen this month it was with out a doubt one with a tremendous amount of heart. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

My review of this film is much the same as James'. While I am not raving about it I am in no two minds about the fact that it is a touching story of loss and acceptance. It is nice to see a drama like this aimed at the teen audience (thanks to the lead Zac Efron who always seems to surprise me) who rarely get to see raw emotion presented in this way.

There were a few things that bothered us about this film and one of them was music, as James already noted. I felt that the music was overpowering the acting which was actually good enough to stand up by itself. The overdramatic score often felt like a neon sign was being held up saying "be sad now". I think the media savvy teenage audiences of today are past this.

I think overall this is a film that people can relate to whether they ahve suffered loss of not. 'Letting go' is often more difficult then everyone expects of you and I think that is what this film is about; seeing past your emotion and remembering you have a life to live.

Perhaps a bit slushy for all our readers but worth a watch if you like heart-wrenching/heart-warming stories. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}

They said:

If you enjoy the Nicholas Sparks type of films (Dear John, Message in a bottle, A Walk to Remember, The Notebook)then this film is right up your alley.We give this film a respectable {{{ 6.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: Do you believe in life after death?

Life as we know it

2010-10-17T23:05:00.001+01:00

Directed by: Greg Berlanti
UK/US Release: 8 October 2010
Starring: Katherine Heigl, Josh Duhamel, Josh Lucas, Alexis Clagett

IMDB page

He said:
This is a film that flirts with the emotions a bit, for every pinch of sadness on screen there is a heaping spoonful of humor. Duhamel and Heigl are very much in their element every moment of this film. Though at times I think Heigl was carrying the emotion of the film on her shoulders.

The triplets playing Sophie steal every scene she/they are in. Though it is less of a performance and more of just a toddler being just that. Sophie evokes more than her fair shares of awws through out the film.

This is a fun and heart warming romantic comedy. It goes with out saying that of course it is predictable at times, but what was the last romantic comedy you saw that you couldn't predict with in the first five minutes of the film. I enjoyed this film and I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

Life As We Know It is a vey cute, feel-good kind of film. It does what you are expecting from these type of comedies; to leave the cinema laughing but having been moved by the story.

It is an interesting plot for a comedy with the main character's best friends dying and leaving their baby to them. However it doesn't dwell on the death and nor does it gloss over it. There is a sense of loss but the focus of the story is on the relationship between Duhamel and Heigl as they bring up Sophie.

Although very good performances by the leads they were undeniably outshone by the baby who plays Sophies who was, in a word, adorable. There was also a great supporting cast who played the nieghbours and a witty performance by their social worker.

Overall this film was warm, moving and entertaining. Heigl and Duhamel have a a sparkling chemistry that really works well for them as a couple and for them as believable parents. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:
This film was wonderfully fun to watch and very much lived up to expectations. We recommend this if you want something light but not slapstick, perhaps to watch with a group of friends or even your partner. We give this film {{{7 of 10}}}

QUESTION OF THE DAY: This film begins with the 'date from hell' between Hiegl and Duhamel. What was your worst date ever?

Made in Dagenham

2010-10-17T15:01:00.005+01:00

Directed by: Nigel Cole
UK Release: 1 October 2010
US Release: 19 November 2010
Starring: Sally Hawkins, Bob Hoskins, Andrea Riseborough, Jaime Winstone, Rosamund Pike

IMDB Page

She said:

I love films that are based on true stories because you can feel them more in your heart. And with a film such as Made in Dagenham you can't help but do a little punch in the air when you see the bigoted men lose some of their power.

This film isn't a feminist film as such; it is simply the story of a group of Ford factory workers who decide enough is enough, and who fight for equal pay for women. It is about fighting for what is right and for not taking your situation for granted.

There is great bit where the lead tells her husband that 'not knocking her around' shouldn't get him extra brownie points because that is as it should be. Unfortunately men still use this kind of trick today and of course women still get paid less than men... but it is still a great film!

The acting is fantastic in this film and though I suspect the Oscars will probably overlook this British flick I am positive it will bag a BAFTA or two come awards season. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:
I really didn't know anything about this film and had already slotted it in my head as an "it's free so why not" film before I had even found my seat in the theatre. I find I do this with a lot of lesser known films and I am frequently blown away by how many of them completely change my opinion. I am happy to say that this was a truly wonderful and worthwhile cinema experience.

Like most people the factory workers of my grandparents generation are hardly people I give much thought to, but every once in a while a film like this is released and show a side of history I was completely ignorant of before the opening credits. This one little factory in Dagenham is a huge part of not just British history, but the history of equality.

This is a fantastic film, and though I think most of our American readers wont see it grace their theatres for a number of months I would definitely suggest everyone check it out. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:
This is an excellent peek into the history of equality and we suggest that you add it to your LoveFIlm/NetFlix as soon as it is available at the very least. we give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

QUESTION OF THE DAY: Is there a moment in history you would like to see translated into film?

Eat Pray Love

2010-10-14T10:57:00.004+01:00

Directed by: Ryan Murphy
UK Release: 24 Sept 2010
US Release: 13 August 2010
Starring: Julia Roberts, Javier Bardiem, Billy Crudup, James Franco, Richard Jenkins

IMDB page

He said:

Eat, Pray, Love is a film that coasts through its narrative; it is a story (based on the memoir of Elizabeth Gilbert) about a woman traveling the world to find herself with a much broader appeal.

This is a long film that some might find stalls a bit while heading towards it's conclusion. I found when the film ends I had enjoyed the journey as much as the destination. Much like life this film has a rhythm all it's own and follows it stunningly.

The destinations in Eat, Pray, Love were all filmed on location, and each of them made me realize there is so much more of our beautiful planet that I have yet to see. This film is about Liz finding not only herself but her place in this world, something I think the large majority of the target audience will identify with very well.

This is a film with a wonderful heart, and I would not be surprised to see it receive numerous nominations as the award season comes around in a few months. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I was really interested to see this film which is about travelling the world to find yourself (something everyone probably wishes they could do if money were no option, which unfortunately it is). I found the film slow to get going and though I hate to admit it, there were points in the narrative when I found myself slightly bored. Despite this however, I really did enjoy what this film was trying to achieve, and overall I think it did achieve it.

Eat Pray Love is definitely a film with a brain and a soul. It is a film that makes you think about your life and the way you live it both practically and spiritually. Although I can't connect to the spiritual side of the story easily (being not spiritual in any way) I appreciated these moments nonetheless. Of course if you aren't into that sort of thing you can always laugh at Julia Roberts and another annoyingly slim woman trying to claim they have 'muffin tops'.

This film was beautifully filmed on location, as James previously mentioned. I found myself much more intrigued about what I can learn from the world and what there is 'out there' to see and discover, rather than looking inwards at myself to 'find my path in life'. It is a movie about self acceptance rather than self reflection; about forgiving yourself for what you have done (whether that be eating too many carbs or something more serious).

Overall despite the slow start it was well worth sticking with. The film really shines in the 'second act' which is mainly due to a fantastic performance by Richard Jenkins, which really solidified my affection for this story. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:

The fact that this film is based on a true story is what makes this film; the fact that the journey and discoveries Julia Roberts' character makes is achievable makes you connect with it more. It is shot on some amazing locations in Italy, India and Bali which will make you drool with envy and make you want to start saving for your next holiday now! We give this film {{{7.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: If you could go anywhere in the world, where would you go?

Devil

2010-10-09T12:45:00.006+01:00

Directed by: John Erick Dowdle
Story by M. Knight Shyamalan
UK / US Release: 17 Sept 2010
Starring: Chris Messina, Logan Marshall-Green, Jenny O'Hara, Bojana Novakovic, Bokeem Woodbine, Geoffrey Arend, Jacob Vargas, Matt Craven, Joshua Peace

IMDB page

She said:

Devil is not the type of film I choose to see on a regular basis. Although I enjoy psychological thrillers and suspense horror I have become a bit disillusioned with the amount of them that Hollywood has spewed out recently. However I gave it a go and, if I am being honest, I am still disillusioned.

Devil is not a bad film per se, it just isn't really the sort of movie you can have a strong opinion about. Although there are a good number of 'jump' moments I was never actually scared. Once the 'jump' was over I went back to being slightly indifferent about the story.

It is very hard for horror/thriller films to not fall into the bucket load of cliches media savvy movie-goers know so well - a little too hard for Devil apparently. Indeed overall this film was interesting to watch but it was just too predictable and ordinary.

I want a horror film to put me on edge and give me something to think about long after the final frame disappears. Unfortunately this film did neither of those things. I give Devil {{{2 out of 5}}}

He said:
Much like Helen, I too have lost what ever prior sense of fear that Hollywood was at one time able to conjure in me. I could ramble on about how much the original (I say original because much like every other film from my childhood it is currently being remade) Child's Play film scared the living daylights out of me at as a 9 year old boy at 2 in the morning during a friends birthday sleepover. Those fictional stories of fantasy and horror have long since become far less frightening in light of how scary reality can be every day.

Devil is really not a bad film and there are even a couple of the standard twists that story writer M. Knight has become known by. Devil is the first in a planned collection loosely named the Night Chronicles. According to the official website "The Night Chronicles is a production entity with Media Rights Capital, focused on generating a series of supernatural thrillers. The films are based on original ideas from M. Night Shyamalan" loosely translated the perpetually downward spiraling writer and director has out sourced his content to other directors.

If you are a fan of overly predictable "Horror/Thrillers" this film is right up your alley, thought with it being October there are sure to be plenty more films in the coming weeks that are sure to be worth your hard earned money. I give this film {{{2.5 out 5}}}

They said: While this film is worth seeing we suggest you wait to rent, NETFLIX or LOVE/FILM it. We give this film {{{4.5 out of 10}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: Have you ever been trapped in a lift?

Buried

2010-10-05T13:12:00.007+01:00

Directed by: Rodrigo Cortés
UK Release: 29 Sept 2010
US Release: 24 Sept 2010
Starring: Ryan Reynolds

IMDB page

He said:

I have been looking forward to this film for nearly a year. I am not sure when I first saw the teaser, but I know that the moment I did that I was excited for this very different take on a one room thriller.

The trailer attached to this review was the first teaser and honestly I think a genius viral marketing campaign. The more common second official trailer gives more idea of the entire story but has scenes that are completely made for the trailer alone, and are not in the film at all.

This is an expertly crafted film, that some how even includes an action sequence. Cortés and Reynolds pull off something that screams for Oscar and BAFTA nominations. There are a lot of Reynolds naysayers in the general public that cite his usual roles as 'general' and 'throw away' comedy. However one thing this film has proven is that he has much more talent than he has ever shown to the general public.

The only film I can rightfully compare Buried to is Castaway, much like Tom Hanks, Reynolds carries this entire film on his back alone, his only real co-star being a Blackberry with ridiculous reception and very poor battery life. I'm just really happy he didn't name it.

This is a film that you will hear a lot of people talk about and I would bet even money will be re-released closer to the Awards season. Buried is a fantastic way to spend 94 minutes, and invites its audience to think outside the box. See what I did there? I give this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

Unlike James I had not heard of this film until two of my friend (Kim and Ross) recommended it to me. I have to admit that I was reluctant at first for two reasons: 1) I am one of those Ryan Reynolds naysayers who saw Van Wilder Party Liaison and just ran away from him screaming and 2) I though it was going to be another Open Water (by which I mean a waste of a few hours of my life).

Due to my aprehension about Buried it was pure intrigue that took me to see this film. A whole movie set in a coffin? Sounds fascinating and by golly it is.

Ryan Reynolds delivers a fantastic performance which, along with Cortes' expert filmmaking, holds the audience's attention throughout the film. Unlike Open Water this film maintains pace and tension without ever leaving the coffin setting.

I would advise against this film if you suffer from intense claustrophobia because it probably isn't the film for you. However it really is an intriguing achievement in filmmaking and I highly recommend it. I give this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

They Said:

This is a film that will be going straight onto those 'films to see before you die' lists. It will grab your attention from the artistic opening credits through to the last frame. We give this film [[[9 out of 10]]]

Question of the week:
What would you do if you woke to find yourself in a coffin six feet under ground?

Going The Distance

2010-10-01T11:00:00.000+01:00

Directed by: Nanette Burstein
UK release: 27 August 2010
US release 3 Sept 2010
Screenplay: Geoff LaTulippe
Starring: Drew Barrymore, Justin Long, Charlie Day, Jason Sudeikis, Christina Applegate, Ron Livingston

IMDB Page

She said:

This film was one James and I really wanted to see in order to work out if Hollywood had any real clue about what it is like to live in a long distance relationship. After all maintaining a relationship over 5000 miles and two continents does make us feel like experts somewhat.

On the whole I think this film did well, but in terms of realism... I think it was a little lacking: it simply portrayed the tip of the iceberg shall we say. Of course this film is a romcom not a serious drama so all in all I think it showed the compromise and strength of long distance relationships really well.

The best bits for me were the comedy and the 'cuteness' (which I think come with Justin Long and Drew Barrymore in a kind of package deal). The friends of Garrett and family of Erin provide the best comic relief as they adapt to their loved one's seeing someone thousands of miles away.

Overall I think this is a film that the majority of people will get something out of. There is enough romance for softies to have a good 'awww' and enough comedy to satisfy those who think 'ewww'. I really enjoyed this light, bubbly tale... and just for the record - long distance is hard, but it is worth it. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:

I saw this film a few weeks ago, and although I really enjoyed it - and was pretty sure Helen would as well - I had a few minor problems with how this long distance couple dealt with both their lives and the relationship they shared.

Obviously Helen and I have been in a long distance relationship for the majority of the time that we have been together. There have been hard times and really low times, but the time we spent together, be it on line via emails, Skype or over the phone, always made things seem better.

While we are always proud to be spoiler free, I will say (without spoiling any major plot details) that most of Erin and Garrett's unhappiness almost always followed a moment where they had spoken. Now, trust me when I tell you that if you can't find the happiness in those short moments where you do get to connect then there are bigger troubles ahead.

This is cute rom-com that obviously hit very close to home for both Helen and I. There is one scene in particular that stood out to both of us about dealing with the future and "figuring it out". I enjoyed this film and while there were parts I disagreed with it left me with a happy heart. {{{I give it 4 out 5}}}

They said:

He said, She said is happy to announce that as this review is posted we are no longer a long distance couple! Together, forever. Go see this film just to make us smile. We give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

Question of the week:
Have you ever been in a long distance relationship? How far apart was it and what kept you strong?

The Town

2010-09-24T15:29:00.005+01:00

Director: Ben Affleck
UK release: 24 Sept 2010
US release 17 Sept 2010
Screenplay: Ben Affleck, Aaron Stockard, Peter Craig
Starring: Ben Affleck, Rebecca Hall, Jeremy Renner, Pete Postlehwaite, Jon Hamm, Blake Lively, Chris Cooper, Titus Welliver

IMDB page

She said:

It takes less than 10 minutes of watching this film to realise that Ben Affleck must have had a hand in the writing of it. It is essentially a film about a man brought up in the wrong place with the wrong people around; a victim of circumstance looking for a change but struggling to take it. This film reminded me a lot of Good Will Hunting in this way (also co-written by Ben Affleck)... but really it was the almost indecipherable Boston accents that were the real give away.

Of course this film is not in the same genre as Good Will Hunting so don't use that film to judge whether you'd like this one. This film shows a more gritty, harsh side of Boston depicting organised crime rather than petty gang squabbles. At some points this film is hard to watch because the violence is very realistic (I had to look away) but it never felt over the top or forced. Instead it gave the film a sense of realism and grabs you very emotionally, even if you don't at first realise that it has.

Really I have to give the credit to the cast particularly Rebecca Hall and Jeremy Renner (who plays Affleck's 'hardcore' best friend with frightening authenticity!) Rebecca Hall I love of course because she is a British actress making it in Hollywood and she does a convincing American accent, although she didn't go down the Boston-twang route. Her performance, along with Ben Affleck's, was understated and powerful. I am sure we will see her in more things!

I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:
I was presently surprised with The Town. I am, like so many others less than impressed when I see Ben Affleck's face on a movie poster. But to be honest the man knows Boston and knows how to direct. This is a well paced and at times surprising film, the likes of which I haven't seen from Affleck since Good Will Hunting.

One of the things that intrigued me the most was how each heist was cleverly conceived and done in a completely different way from the previous heist we had seen. The few chases in the film were executed brilliantly and had me on the edge of my seat while on screen.

Helen mentioned above Renner's performance being spot on, I think one of the roles that showed real acting chops was Blake Lively's performance, though to be honest her Boston accent was the most obviously forced in the film, her performance was spot on. It obviously didn't hurt that the character of Krista is about as far from the Sisterhood of traveling pants Lively that most audiences have come to expect.

This is a well written and fantastic directed film that surprised me more than once, I left the theatre pleasantly surprised and possibly secretly plotting my own armored car (or Bread Truck) heist. I enjoyed this film and I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:
A fun well paced if, at times overly violent picture of bank heists in Boston, not a bad date night film that you both can enjoy we give it [[[8 out of 10]]]

Question of the Week: What is your favorite Heist film?

Resident Evil: Afterlife {3D}

2010-09-17T18:40:00.007+01:00

Written & Directed by Written and Directed by Paul W.S. Anderson
World Wide release Sept 10 2010
Starring: Milla Jovovich, Ali Larter, Kim Coates, Shawn Roberts, Sergio Peris-Mencheta, Spencer Locke, Boris Kodjoe, Wentworth Miller

Resident Evil: Afterlife -

IMDB Link

He said:
I have to admit that the Resident Evil films have been a guilty pleasure of mine for as long as they have been around. Milla Jovovich is the embodiment of the female action star and she owns that particular title in each of these often ridiculous but always entertaining films.

One of the things that has to be discussed right away is that RE:A was actually filmed in 3D (like James Cameron's Avatar blockbuster) while admittedly most of the effects were obviously over the top for that reason, it suited this film well, once and for all cementing the fact that the extra investment during production provides a much better product than the common post production 3D hack jobs. (we are looking at you Clash of the Titans and Alice in Wonderland) Although it is hard to say that the 3D effects added much to the film I can say it didn't detract from it at all.

Fans of the Resident Evil games will notice a distinct return to the games cannon with a special appearance from a certain Executioner from the fifth installment of the game franchise. It really seemed as though Anderson spent the majority of the film bringing the franchise back to its video game roots and setting up the next installment in the film series.

Over all this is a fun film and worth watching in cinema, if you want to check out the 3D version I suggest a matinee showing to offset the additional costs. Times are tough and we rarely see examples of films worth the 3D rates. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

Question of the Week: What is the best video game adapted to film? What do you think is the worst to date Let us know in the comments!!!

Zombieland

2010-09-09T22:01:00.010+01:00

Director: Ruben Fleischer
UK release: 7 October 2009
Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin

IMDB page

He said:

This film could have very easily been just another zombie film that passed us by but with excellent humor and fantastic writing this movie hits its mark in so many different places with an excellent cast.

If you are anything like me the film will leave you searching the interwebs in hopes of a sequel. (Last I checked a sequel has been greenlit, and a script has been drafted, but the film is not yet in production). According to IMDB the four leads are expected to return.

This is a fun film that has a lot of fun humor and some great cameo appearances, I would recommend you rent it for a fun movie night with your friends and maybe (if it is legal for you to do so) try to devise a drinking game to go along with the film. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

I was interested to see this film that had been pegged as the US version of Shaun of the Dead. Indeed they are both hilarious zombie comedies and quintessential examples of the cultures in which they were produced. For example, while our heroes in the British Shaun of the Dead try to make it to the pub down the road, in Zombieland we travel across the United States towards, of course(!), Los Angeles.

I found this film highly enjoyable. As James said, the script is well written with sharp wit and great pacing. However I have to say that it is the actors, with their fantastic comic performances and their delicious on-screen chemistry, that make this film. Although I see Jesse Eisenberg as an uglier version of Michael Cera he definitely holds his own as the lead in the film, carefully guiding the audience through Zombieland with his rules of survival.

Funnily enough I too searched for the possibility of a sequel when I finished the DVD and hope to be seeing the planned zombie sequel come to life (excuse the pun). My favourite part has to be a sufficiently surreal cameo by an actor much-loved by myself and pretty much the whole world - I'm not telling you who though so you'll have to rent it out! I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:

Overall this film is highly enjoyable and has comedy to suit most tastes from satire to slapstick; the Zombieland 'rules of survival' even give many scenes a comic book feel. Plus, y'know, at the end of the day who doesn't like a bit of blood and guts and being chased by the undead. We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMENTS: Do you have a favourite Zombie film? What is it and why? Also, if you were running from zombies - where would you choose to go?

The Matrix

2010-09-02T16:35:00.013+01:00

Director: Andy and Lana Wachowski
UK release: June 1999
Starring: Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugo Weaving, Gloria Foster, Joe Pantoliano

IMDB page

She said:

There is no doubting the fact that The Matrix is one of 'the' films you have to see before you die. In my mind - and the mind of the general consensus it would seem - The Matrix joins a long list of films that have in some way impacted the movie world by challenging audiences and giving them something new.

If you think of a film like Labyrinth or Wizard of Oz then you realsie that the concepts in The Matrix are not new ones. Writers have come up with dream worlds that question our notion of reality before. What The Matrix did was take these ideas and explode them into something bigger, something more fantastic, more science-fictiony and yet at the same time gave it this very paranoia inducing sense of realism ala 1984. I mean... what if the matrix is real?

I have to mention also the fantastic special effects and the complete popularization of the extreme slo-mo shot and, of course, the freeze-with-360-degree-spin. These slick and sexy special effects along with the tight PVC, long black coats and oh-so-cool shades I remember thinking wow(!), this film is HOT.

The cast is stellar in this and I have to commend Keanu Reeves for showing us a different side to his acting I can't help but rave about Hugo Weaving as Agent Smith. He is a fantastic actor and one of the most alluring 'old guys' ever on screen. I still hope that random people will suddenly morph into him as I walk down the street... hasn't happened yet. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:

The Matrix is one of those films where I tend to remember the day I saw the film more than the actual film itself. My brother and I saw The Matrix on it's opening day and we were both completely blown away by the concept of it all. The idea that we could be living inside a simulation was just a fantastic idea.

I remember he and I were sparring for the rest of the day and the three days following usually sparked by one of us looking at the other and saying "I know Kung-Fu" and the other replying "Show me."

I've loved films and the cinema experience for the majority of my life and it is films like this that reinforce that feeling and/or emotion that maybe, just maybe, my mundane life could one day be so much more.

This is a film that, though it does seem dated now, it isnt any less fun and if you are paying attention you will start to see how many films have been influenced by just this one nearly 12 year old movie. Any time life seems just a bit too real I ask myself: "Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?" I give this film a {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:

If you have never seen The Matrix the effects will probably look dated because they have been parodied so many times though! It is however a modern classic! The next two films... erm... yeah...

Just remember - "there is no spoon". We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: WHAT IS THE MATRIX?

Scott Pilgrim vs The World

2010-08-27T10:18:00.014+01:00

Director: Edgar Wright
UK release: August 2010
Starring: Michael Cera, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Alison Phil, Anna Kendrick, Johnny Simmons, Ellen Wong, Kieran Culkin, Brandon Routh

IMDB page

He said:

As I am sure Helen is going to tell you below; this is not a film that fits into any one genre or niche. While it hasn't found an audience in theatres you can bet your loose change that it will have a huge DVD following.

The film is well paced and edited, and the character development is outstanding. There is not one character in this film that you are introduced to, that you then won't remember an hour later when they show up again.

The two cameos that amused me the most were Brandon Routh (Superman Returns) and Chris Evans (Captain America, The Losers and Fantastic Four franchise) mostly due to the fact that scrawny little Scott Pilgrim managed to hold his own against them!

This is a fun film with a great soundtrack and exciting visuals that take hold of you from literally the spinning of the Universal Productions at the beginning of the film. This is a great film to see with your friends and will definetly be part of my film collections as soon as it is available on DVD and BluRay. I give this film [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

She said:

It took me only three or four minutes to know that I was going to love this film. And it took me only half an hour after that to understand that I was watching one of the cinema highlights of the year. Despite what the poor Box Office figures might suggest, Scott Pilgrim vs The World is a funny, original, unique and genre-breaking film. And I for one loved it.

The thing that really stood out for me about Scott Pilgrim was the genre defying style and structure; this is a film that isn't based in reality, yet I didn't feel like the label of fantasy would do it justice. Scott Pilgrim takes your idea of film and then tips it on its head, adds a bit of comic book, mixes up some video game, throws in some ironic indie rock and finished with a twist of sitcom. Then kaboom! You have a completely new genre.

Fascinating to watch for many reasons, Scott Pilgrim is rich in detail from cultural references galore to visual Easter Eggs (ala the third evil ex wearing a t-shirt with a 3 on it). Much like musicals show us what reality would be like if omnipresent bands started playing music randomly throughout your day, Scott Pilgrim shows us what the world would be like if cartoon strips were real.

Overall I am incredibly impressed by this film, and what a wonderful way fro director Edgar Wright to move into Hollywood. But then again with hits like Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz under his belt I really didn't expect a disaster from him. This film made me smile with its wit, charm and above all its unashamed propensity to push the boundaries of cinematic convention. I give this film {{{5 out of 5}}}

They said:

Even if it turns out not to be your thing this film is worth a watch for its hyperbolic take on a fantastically original story. It also deserves kudos for having the credits sequence at the start of the movie. He said she said loves a bit of 'old school'. We give this film {{{9.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: What is your favourite comic book / graphic novel adaptation to date and why?

The Sorcerer's Apprentice

2010-08-19T16:53:00.008+01:00

Director: John Turteltaub
UK release: August 2010
Starring: Nicolas Cage, Alred Molina, Jay Baruchel, Teresa Palmer, Monica Bellucci

IMDB Page

She said:

Most people will know the Sorcerer's Apprentice as 'that scene' in Fantasia where Mickey Mouse enchants some brooms and loses control of them. It is striking and vivid, and as a 5 year old child I loved it. If you haven't seen it, click here for the bit from Fantasia. So I think it is safe to say a had some doubts when I heard about this Nicolas Cage film which is, essentially, a 2010 blockbuster based on a 1940 Disney cartoon set to a piece of Dukas music from 1897 that is based on a Goethe poem written in 1797. I didn't see how they could make this film without completely destroying the layers of history behind it; I'm glad to say that this didn't happen!

Now, like many people toying with the idea of seeing this film I was mightily put off by the fact it starred Nicolas Cage, aka Mr Wooden. Wow is that man a terrible 'actor' who we can all agree would not be as famous if he wasn't a Coppola. However I have to put my hands up and say "I enjoyed it. I enjoyed a Mr Wooden film". Cage's cliched acting actually fitted in quite well with this fluffy family film and created a great comic duo along with sidekick (or apprentice!) Jay Baruchel.

The thing I really enjoyed about The Sorcerer's Apprentice is the special effects and imagination. The film marries science and technology with magic and folklore to create a modern twist. There is no denying this is a film based solely around spectacle (as is the original Goethe poem) and I personally loved the scope and creativity of the special effects; the giant Eagles detaching from the Chrysler Building springs to mind.

However I do not want to oversell this film. Despite being enjoyable this isn't the best written plot ever, and could have been executed better. Like a lot of family fantasies the director forgets to give the back story as much attention as the action. Despite learning the history of the Sorcerer and the villain (played by Molina) I found both characters under-developed emotionally. I didn't believe their motives totally and I think this should have been catered to, for more mature viewers like myself.

Overall this film was not the disaster I was expecting. The soundtrack, composed by Trevor Rabin takes musical influence from the original Dukas music while their is an obligatory homage to 'that' Mickey Mouse scene. I give this film {{{3 out of 5}}}.

He said:

Like Helen I really didn't expect very much sitting down to watch this film. If you have read any of our previous reviews involving Nicholas Cage you will know that we are not his biggest fans. However he does occasionally find a role that suits him, Con Air and Gone in 60 Seconds spring to mind.

Helen has already touched on the various high points of the film far more eloquently than I could ever hope to. I will say that as unlikely a duo as Cage and Baruchel are, they have excellent on-screen chemistry together. This is, at its heart, a buddy film.

Baruchel's character - Dave - accomplishes something very few characters in similar fantastical situations manage to do; he remains the geeky teen guy that he is. So often we see characters that inherit amazing abilities and then find themselves defined by said abilities. But Dave manages to still be every bit as geeky even when he finally gains control over his abilities. I'm not sure if this is due to Baruchels superb acting ability, or if Jay Baruchel is really just that much of a geek! I think I'll let you all weigh in on that particular debate in the comments below.

Overall this is a fun film and I give it {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:

Depending on your personal opinion of Nicholas Cage and Jay Baruchel this is undoubtedly still a fun film that at the very least is worth renting for a family night in. We give it {{{{6.5 out of 10}}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: What is the worst Nicolas Cage film you have ever seen?

Inception

2010-08-12T18:48:00.006+01:00

Director: Christopher Nolan
UK release: July 2010
Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Ken Watanabe, Cillian Murphy, Michael Caine

IMDB page

He said:

This is one of those films that when you leave the theatre you'll be debating with your cinema-going mates about their ideas of 'what really happened'. Helen and I both have interesting ideas on this film but as we are spoiler free we will leave that for another time!

The characters in Inception are very well developed though at times some are under used. I think Christopher Nolan has an incredible talent at telling a tightly woven story and, regardless of how much you must suspend your disbelief, he makes each and every world he creates a reality. As fantastic and outlandish as this film is - at no point did I think "...that would never happen."

If I had any complaints at all about this film it is the underdevelopment of Ellen Page's character; I felt she had a little too much insight for an undergraduate architecture student. In no way does it take away from the film but it is something that I found a tad odd.

This is really a definitive summer blockbuster (something that this otherwise lacklustre summer has had short supply of). Be warned this is a thinking film and if you miss the first 10 minutes the rest will be very hard to follow.

I really enjoyed this film and would recommend it to any fans of cinema. I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

She said:

If this film doesn't win Best Picture at the 2011 Academy Awards I will be very much surprised. I was, in short, blown away by the technological scale and ambition of this film, let alone the philosophical implications of the narrative. I personally enjoy films that make you think, and that require the audience to contribute in some way (as James said, you will probably be debating the meanings behind this film for a long while after you leave the screen).

I think the casting for this film was spot on. Leonardo DiCaprio, I've felt, has always spent his time trying to get rid of the shadow of Titanic and remind people of his raw talent. His performance in Inception, along with his last film Shutter Island, has solidified his place in the 'psychological thriller hall of fame'.

The best thing about this film is the social commentary; it almost adds a new chapter to the Big Brother legacy that hangs over modern times. Indeed as James said Christopher Nolan (who also directed The Dark Knight and Memento) expertly makes the notion of entering another person's mind through a dreamworld actually seem believable.

Perhaps excluding people who can't follow complex plots, this film caters to pretty much everyone: it has crowd pleasing - read mind boggling - special effects, coupled with a intricately weaved narrative with back story and meaning. I give this film {{{5 out of 5}}}

They said:

This is a film that we highly recommend watching. As Helen's mother said: "Think of The Matrix.... but times ten". Keep an eye out for this during awards season. We give this film {{{9.5 out of 10}}}

QUESTION FOR THE COMMENTS: What is the most confusing film you've ever seen?

Toy Story 3

2010-08-05T20:46:00.009+01:00

Director:Lee Unkrich
UK release: July 2010
Starring (voices): Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, John Ratzenberger, Joan Cusack, Michael Keaton

IMDB PAGE

She said:

When the first Toy Story came out I was just 9 years old, and I remember being blown away. As the first feature length computer generated animation, this is the film series that transformed the face of animation forever. Suddenly everyone was marveling at the new possibilities but, at its heart, Toy Story caught people's imaginations for a different reason; its heart.

On the surface Toy Story is about childhood and playing, but dig a little deeper and you know the true heart of the story are the friendships between the characters and how they work together towards their common goal (making Andy, their owner, happy).

With these things in mind I have to admit being pretty nervous about seeing Toy Story 3. I couldn't see how they would end the series without it being on a negative note - either Andy would ditch them all before college, or he would split them up, or he would leave them to gather dust. But good ol' Pixar always pull through. I am impressed that they came up with such a genuine and satisfying 'end' to the series.

I have to admit that introducing Ken (of Ken and Barbie fame) into the mi of new characters was a stroke of genius. I think it is especially funny that Barbie and Ken play prominent roles in this film after Mattel refused to have the blonde icon in the original Toy Story!

While Ken provided humour, the Big Baby character caused me great anxiety. I am glad I didn't watch this installment aged 9! Big Baby is the type of character often used in children's films because unlike 'the villain' they are misunderstood and misguided. Big Baby in particular provides a contrast to the 'evilness' of Lots'o'Huggin Bear who is jealous and bitter. It provides a good moral message for the kids watching that doing bad things is a choice and redemption is always possible.

Overall I was really pleased with this film. Having struggled on one of my past radio shows to choose between Shrek and Toy Story I have to hold my hands up and confess my loyalty to Woody and Buzz. I have no doubt these films will be enjoyed to infinity and beyond. I give this film [5 out of 5].

He said:

I have a long history with this series as well, I was 15 when the first film was released but it struck a chord with me as for the majority of my childhood I had hoped that my toys would come to life. (Infact due to a lack of Ken dolls my sisters Barbie's had numerous affairs with which ever action figure happened to be with in reach. Beetleguese was often very pleased with his breakfast companions.)

There are a lot of little nods to the prior films in Toy Story 3 some blatantly obvious and some not so much. One of them that caught my eye was the nearly adult Sid at the beginning of the film with the garbage truck scene. The ever present Pizza Planet 'Yo' truck and of course The Claw.

The Toy Story trilogy is fantastic in that even though time has passed for our friends they are exactly as we remember them. I can guarantee that this is a trilogy that will still be as poignant heart warming and touching for my children as it was for Helen and myself. The same can not be said about many movies.

This is a great film and a wonderful addition to a fantastic series. If you are only going to see one film this summer you will not be disappointed with Toy Story 3 {{{{I give it 5 out of 5}}}}

They said:
We both enjoyed this film be warned there are definitely tear-jerker moments but this is a fantastic family film. [[[[We give it 10 out of 10]]]]

Overboard (directed by Garry Marshall)

2010-06-18T22:33:00.003+01:00

IMDB page

Released: 1987
Starring: Goldie Hawn, Kurt Russell, Mike Hagerty, Edward Herrman, Jared Rushton, Hector Elizondo

She said:

This film has been one of our family picks since I can remember. It is one of those films that always makes me smile no matter what. Overboard is probably one of my favourite comedies of all time. To start with has anyone ever seen a Garry Marshall film that didn't make them feel all warm inside? A few other of his directorial masterpieces include Beaches, Pretty Woman and, more recently, Valentine's Day. He has a theme of comedies with heart and this one is no different.

Of course the main credit I have to give to Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, the leading actors and also a real life couple. I class this as their best comedy roles on screen. Interestingly when this film came out it was actually a big flop for both of them and I really can't understand why. They have fantastic chemistry when they play hatred of each other and when they fall in love. Perhaps it was one of those films that needed a few years post-release perspective. Or maybe I am the only person who loves it! But I doubt that very much.

While this film is a 'bit silly' in its plot it does have a wonderful warmth to it. It is essentially a film about how true love can cross boundaries of class and expectation. It is also about giving people second chances: Hawn plays a - how can I put this nicely? - upper class stuck up bitch who has only disgust for Russell's character (a hardworking dad who struggles with parental control). When she gets amnesia what begins as a tale of revenge and payback turns into something special, something real and deep.

I can't recommend this film enough. It has fantastic comic performances from leads and supporting actors alike, and it has some real gems of moments that give you a fuzzy feeling and make you want to hug your pillow (or partner!). I give this film (((5 out of 5.)))

He said:

Overboard is one of those films that you can't help but to smile all the way through. It has some moments that are a bit suspect, but endearing all the same. Garry Marshall was one of the first directors that enjoyed casting his friends in every film.

Hector Elizondo has a small part in this film that nearly goes by unnoticed. (You would recognize him as the Hotel Concierge in Pretty Woman) And there are others that have slipped my mind.

There are some scenes in this film that are a bit close to being beyond awkward. I think it goes with out saying that if a film about kidnapping ad forced parenthood was released now, it wouldn't do well in theatres.

My Dad (Happy Fathers Day!) really enjoys this film as well, it's fun to hear him laughing the whole way through the film. This is a great family film and is completely worth viewing. I enjoyed it and I think you will as well. I give it [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

They said:
This is a fantastic film, and one of the few Eighties films you can watch that doesn't feel completely and hopelessly dated with each viewing. It is well worth your time and we fully encourage everyone to watch it soon. we give it{{{9.5 out of 10}}}

Sex and the City 2 (Directed by Michael Patrick King)

2010-06-17T12:08:00.007+01:00

IMDB Page

She said:

There is no denying it - this movie left political correctness at the door and took a trip to bad scripting land but I have to admit: I kind of loved it. I think it was one of those 'so bad it is good' kind of deals. I pretty much spent the entire time covering my face in astonishment, but it was so unashamedly cringeworthy that I couldn't help laughing along with it.

This film was set up to be a kind of critique of post-recession life although I didn't see this in the film at all. Sex and the City is luxury, it is fashion and style, it is extravagance. I can't see how a big downer on the recession would have fitted into this without it being depressing to be honest. Rather I felt the film focussed on two main themes: womanhood and conformity (or non-conformity, if you like). It was also about not being ashamed of your own feelings.

The film was set mainly in Abu Dhabi and while it was sad to move away from New York I have to admit that I enjoyed gorking over the $22,000 a night suite they had. Of course being set in the United Arab Emirates meant that the script writers went for the cliche jokes about burkas and the oppression of women. And while I have no qualms in saying that I do not personally agree with the treatment of women in the Middle East just for religious justification*, the film treads a tightrope which I really am not sure they made across.

(*I just want to point out that my opinions on the oppression of women spread to pretty much most religions in some way or another. It is part of the reason I am an athiest.)

Overall there were bad moments aplenty - Samatha's refusal to observe local custom's was pretty cringeworth, as was the karaoke - but also some amazing moments. One scene had Liza Minnelli singing Single Ladies which is now my utmost favourtie cinema moment of 2010 so far. I snorted with laughter. Literally. And in general I understood the message they were trying to put across underneath the risque humour - that women are their own people, who should be who they want and have relationships that suit them and their partner.

If you are not a fan of Sex and the City you can wait for DVD and will probably think it is terrible. If you are a fan of Sex and the City you can wait for the DVD and will probably think it is terrible. I give this film a very generous 3.5 out of 5. If I wasn't in such an open minded mood I think this could go as low as 2 though!

Get Him to the Greek (Directed by Nicholas Stoller)

2010-06-12T20:20:00.004+01:00

The first of James' solo reviews in America:

IMDB LINK

Starring:
Jonah Hill, Russell Brand, Rose Byrne, Sean(P. Diddy)Combs,

He said:

This movie is a spin-off from Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008). Jonah Hill is in both films, but as two different characters. Kristen Bell reprises her role as Sarah Marshall in a cameo. And Russell Brand reprises the roll that introduced him to American audiences.

This film has a lot of really funny moments and is a rare exception of getting the full mileage out of what could have been a one trick pony. Russell Brand is a hilarious British comedian and excells at portraying himself.

Much like Forgetting Sarah Marshall, this film has some cringe inducing moments. I will say that this is not a film you would play for your junior high youth groups, but as long as you are alright with awkward situational comedy you will enjoy this film. I give it {{{4.0 out of 5}}}

Forgetting Sarah Marshall (Directed by Nicholas Stoller)

2010-06-10T21:25:00.007+01:00

Starring: Jason Segel, Kristen Bell, Mila Kunis, Russell Brand, Bill Hader, Jonah Hill, Paul Rudd

IMDB Link

He said:

This is one of those films that is so well written and timed that I really feel I can watch it over and over and still laugh at all the little jokes. In fact, I have watched this film twice in the last 9 days, and it was still amusing both times.

Jason Segel not only starred in this film he wrote it as well. This is a film that gives into temptation to go for the sight gag a little more often than I felt was absolutely necessary but the humor through out it well worth the price of admission.

One of the reason I enjoy this film as much as I do is it reminds me of the two weeks I spent in Hawaii alone a few years back. It was one of the best vacations I had ever had (before an extended vacation in England this year) but there is always the constant reminder that Hawaii should be shared with some one. I really feel that though it is subtle you feel that from the beginning.

I really enjoy this film, its definetly a film that will put a smile on your face, from start to finish I give this film 4 out of 5.

She said:

I was aphrehensive about watching this film because it not my type of comedy. I like political or black comedies or, if we go down the more slapstick route, I like British comedies. Hoever I gave it a go and to be honest I quite enjoyed it. Overall I think it was well written with a solid comedy plot line, however I did have a couple of reservations.

I felt some of the jokes weren't well timed and didn't have good follow through. For example when a joke is made about an awkward situation I feel this should sit for a minute. I find that with films in this particular genre of American comedy they have a quick succession of jokes or try to continue the humour. The characters are David Brent but without irony (don't know David Brent? Click here).

I also find with these comedies that they are written by a team of friends who deliberately write in a part for everyone. The waiter, played by Jonah Hill, should have either been cut or rewritten. His lines were not funny and the execution poor. However there was the potential for his character to be hilarious. I suspect what happened was the team realised they had yet to include a bit for him and thought "let's have a closeted homosexual waiter who fancies Russell Brand" without much more thought (Russell Brand of course playing himself).

But apart from this I did have fun watching it. Some of the funny parts - like the naked break up - I found funny but not in a laugh out loud way. So in conclusion it was fun to watch... but not my favourite comedy ever. I give this film 3.5 out of 5.

They said:
A fun film worth a viewing, it will give you a few chuckles if nothing else. We give this light-hearted comedy {{{7.5 out of10}}}

Some like it Hot (Directed by Billy Wilder)

2010-06-08T19:09:00.005+01:00

IMDB page

Starring: Jack Lemmon, Tony Curtis, Marilyn Monroe

She said:

If you are yet to see Some like it Hot (1959) then let me tell you - you have really missed out. This is a classic comedy that has stood the test of time. Risque for its time this is repeatedly voted as one of the best films of all time and it is easy to see why. Many films have tried the 'men undercover as women' story since but none have met the level of wit and sheer enjoyability of this film.

The best thing about Some Like it Hot is of course its three main actors - Jack Lemmon, Tony Curtis and Marilyn Monroe, all big stars at the time. It is great to watch films with Monroe because her images is probably one of the most replicated in history and yet, weirdly enough, most younger people probably haven't seen her in that much! She has an air of mystery (and tragedy) surrounding her and this film is an example of how magical an actress she was. She is cute and very funny, playing ditzy babe - appropriately called Sugar Kane - with ease.

Of course the two men give stellar performances as Josephine and Daphne! The situations are hilarious with one girl being courted by a rich gentlemen and the other trying to court Monroe. Their dynamic as a comedy duo is sharp and, as I said earlier, the style and delivery of the jokes stands the test of time.

Personally I would much rather watch this drag film than something like White Chicks (2004) or Sorority Boys (2002). Perhaps the concept was more risque back in the 50s and therefore seems fresh and not so slapstick as it does now. In fact there are also women in very little clothes and homosexual undertones in this film! I expect this film was many a person's guilty pleasure when it came out. I can't imagine mothers wanting their teenage daughters running out to see something this 'out there'.

One of the most sophisticated and funny comedies in history which claims one of the most famous movie lines ever - "I'm actually a man!" "Well... nobody's perfect." It also has one of the most famous behind-the-scenes quotes ever: when Curtis was asked what is is like to kiss Marilyn Monroe he said it was "like kissing Hitler".

Watch it for Monroe, watch it for Lemmon/Curtis it doesn't matter just watch it. I give this film 5 out of 5.

The Hangover (directed by Todd Phillips)

2010-06-04T12:38:00.006+01:00

IMDB page

Starring: Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms, Justin Bartha , Bradley Cooper, Heather Graham

She said:

It has to be said that I am not the biggest fan of these kind of slapstick comedies. I find the humour immature and, while I understand that is the whole point, I just don't find it that funny. I spent most of the film not hating it and not loving it but rather finding it mildly amusing. I didn't laugh out loud for at least 20 minutes though so my expectations were pretty low from the get go. However it redeemed itself in some places and overall this film is - in my expert film reviewers opinion - 'alright'.

As I was watching I was think about what my rating would be for this film. I have to admit there were scenes or events that had me as low as 2 and some that had me as high as a 3.5. The best part for me was when they parodied Rain Man. There is a moment where they come down the escalator, one character as Tom Cruise and one as Dustin Hoffman, with Iko Iko playing over the top. It is these kind of moments that we film buffs love. Little homages and nods to other films where you the viewer can feel privileged that you 'get it'.

The lowest point... I have to say there were several so it is hard to choose. There was a scene with a woman breastfeeding - always going to be a cheap gag. Congratulations script writers... you made a boob joke! Well done you! These are the moments which make me not like this style of comedy. Jokes about breasts and tazering each other just can't stand up to intelligent or ironic humour.

In terms of characters they were pretty much what I expected them to be. All of the main characters are, of course, complete idiots but Alan's idiocy is much more offbeat making him stand out to me. But the filmmakers played on too many stereotypes and I spent a lot of time willing them to go somewhere different from the cliche they were leading up to.

Overall this really wasn't a bad film despite some of my harsh comment. But I am not going to rave about a film that a bunch of twelve year old boys who spend their time looking at Playboys and discussing who has the best knockers. I give this film 3 out of 5.

He said:
I have to start this review stating that I saw this film when it was first released in the states with my brother and we both really enjoyed it. I haven't seen it since that first time, but I did enjoy it.

I agree with what Helen has said above, it is cliche and typical guy humor, but I think that reason alone is one of the reasons we went to see it. I really enjoy these type of comedies. They could be done better and they could easily be more intelligent but I think their imaturity and need to go for the easy "boob" jokes is part of their charm.

There are a lot of films that set out to be a certain type of film, be it comedy, Drama, Sci-fi or a hybrid of some type, and completely miss the mark. This is really not one of those types of films it fulfils the promise it makes with the trailer. You will laugh, you will enjoy the film and it wont be the worst film you see this year.

Obviously I enjoy films like this and it is for that reason that I am a little more lax when they play it safe with the easy cliched types of comedy that we see in a lot of current films. [[[I give this film 4 out of 5]]]

They said:
This isn't a family friendly comedy. It is adult humor with a less than adult situation. Over all it is worth watching {{{{we give it 7 out of 10}}}}

Prince of Persia: Sands of Time (Directed by Mike Newell)

2010-06-02T18:20:00.000+01:00

IMDB LINK
Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Gemma Arterton, Ben Kingsley, Alfred Molina

He said:
I have to say of all the failed video game to film adaptions that I have seen (see Super Mario Brothers, Street Fighter, and Mortal Kombat films) This film really held up well, as Helen says below it is fairly predictable at times, and it seems like the costumes department did everything they could to put Gemma Arterton in to to skimpy.

The action scenes in this film are top notch, the parkour (or free running if you prefer) was fantastic. This film has an excellent energy and spot on energy. Definitely worth watching and a fun blockbuster of a film. I give this [[[4 out of 5]]]

She said:

I wasn't convinced I was going to like this film but in actual fact I had a lot of fun watching it. I think I was a little skeptical because it was so big, so blockbuster-y, and so commercial. But then, as I sat down in the cinema, I remembered... what the hell is wrong with that? I love big obscenely over-budgeted action flicks. It is what Hollywood is all about! So when I had this brain nudge I just sat back and took in the film and, as I said, I really quite liked it.

Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton had a great chemistry although I feel the script writers forced it a little in places. They were both funny and heroic and reminded me of the Fraser/Weisz pairing in the Mummy i.e. underestimated beautiful woman and a rough and tumble action man. It is a classic combination for a reason I guess! I was hoping they wouldn't use every possible opportunity to put Gemma Arterton in a skimpy outfit though... I guess they couldn't resist.

I have no knowledge of the game that this film was adapted from so I can't comment on the accuracy of it. But I believe that the story in the game held up well as an action-adventure film. It is the type of film that, if I didn't know it was based on a game I would say 'they could make a great video game of this'.

Overall this film is a great family flick with a good amount of action and humour. It teeters on the line of predictability in its mode of storytelling sometimes but it is a forgivable sin. Not the best film you'll see this year but I'd still recommend it. I give this film 3 out of 5.

They said:
This is a great summer film and worth watching, if you are looking for a big action blockbuster and you already have seen Iron Man 2 than you should check out this film. We give this film {{{7 out of 10}}}

Moon (directed by Duncan Jones)

2010-05-30T21:21:00.006+01:00

He said she said are temporarily apart! Oh no! But never fear. The blog shall continue and you will still be getting the best reviews right here at He said, she said. We will be posting separately when a film intrigues us, and together for the bigger summer blockbusters. Keep reading! Keep commenting!

IMDB page

Starring: Sam Rockwell, Kevin Spacey (voice)

She said:

I have wanted to watch this film ever since I first saw the poster (and in actual fact I only saw the trailer just before watching the film itself). If you pay close attention to our blog I am sure I have mentioned at some point what a sucker I am for anything stuck in space. I have high expectations and I have to say - these expectations were definitely fulfilled by Moon. This film is a masterpiece and I really enjoyed it.

This film is about so many things and yet has a single primary actor, Sam Rockwell who I will go on to rave about (and there may be some drool) in just a moment. This film explores loneliness, perceptions of reality, morality, ethics, humanity, emotion and empathy. And it does so with actually quite a simple basic story. Without giving the whole plot away this is basically a film about a guy called Sam who has a contract to work for an energy company, on the moon, alone, for three years. Then one day he discovers someone who is... well him. I was instantly intrigued by this premise.

Sam Rockwell was given the hard task of first playing someone who has been alone for three years, and second acting to himself. He did both of these wonderfully. I personally cannot conceive of the things being alone for three years would do to your mind but Rockwell managed to achieve a connection with the audience through his very honest and raw acting. His interaction with GERTY (the computer) was was warming mcuh like Tom Hanks' Wilson in Castaway. And then of course it is not easy for an actor to interact with himself on screen but again this was done very well by Rockwell, supported by the effects team.

By the way you get a shot of him naked. He has a nice bum. This is the drool part.

One of the things that impressed me most about this film was the cinematography and the fact that unlike a lot of films set on the moon or an alien planet, this didn't look like it was filmed in a desert outside Los Angeles. In fact it looked indeed as if it were shot on the moon! I know it can't have been - but the effects were beautifully done. I have read that they were models rather than CGI which I always think gives a better finish, provided it is done well.

If the above doesn't convince you then I know this next fact will interest at least some of my friends: Duncan Jones, the debuting director, is the son of David Bowie. That man can do a good space song - I guess it is no wonder his son would direct a film set on the moon with such grace and beauty.

Made on a budget of $5million, which is very little in cinema terms, this film is worth a watch. It isn't action packed, it isn't a laugh a minute, but I would be very surprised if you walked away unaffected by this bittersweet story: a story of human capability in regards to what our race is capable of surviving, and what our race is capable of doing. I give this film 4.5 out of 5.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (Directed by Samuel Bayer)

2010-05-23T17:00:00.000+01:00

IMDB LINK
Starring: Jackie Earle Haley, Kyle Gallner, Rooney Mara, Katie Cassidy, Thomas Dekker

She said:

It has been over 20 years since the original Freddy Kruger horror and it was only a matter of time before it was brought up to date. This remake was well done with a distinctly creeper murderer and some not-quite-so-obnoxious-you-are-glad-they-are-dead-but-verging-on-it-teenagers.

Overall I found this quite enjoyable but I have to admit that it didn't strike fear into my heart. Perhaps I am a bit too old to be scared by slasher flicks. I am much more inclined towards psychological thrillers which make you think. Freddy Kruger is more of a creepy man whose power over the audience ends when the final frame disappears.

Perhaps I can't remember the original very well (or maybe as a child I didn't understand it) but I found the child-abuse aspect much more emphasised in this remade version. Unfortunately the teenagers reactions weren't very convincing. I personally would be a bit more distressed and psychologically damaged when finding out I had been abused by a gardener at my old school. But maybe that's just me?

It wasn't terrible but if you aren't fussed about horrors then you can definately wait for DVD. I give this {{{3 out of 5}}}

He said:
With so many reboots hitting theaters in recent years it comes as no surprise the Freddy Kruger would be getting a face lift. This film is a fairly faithful remake of the 1986 original going as far as having similar nightmares. (though gone was the animated 2d nightmare that resembled A-ha's music video Take on me much to my chagrin.)

My real problem with me is that these type of films just don't scare me. I find that given the life I have lived that fantasy like this is just that. There are jump moments in this film and if your date is one of those edge of his or her seat types you might find you'll leave the theatre either covered in their popcorn, or possible with a bruise resembling their grip on your forearm.

All things being fair and equal it was a fun film and was faithful to the original and is worth watching I give this film a well deserved [[[3.5 out 5]]]

They said:

This is a good homage to the 1986 Nightmare on Elm Street and worth a watch... but don't rush out to the cinema right this second. We give this film {{{6.5 out of 10}}}

Robin Hood (Directed by Ridley Scott)

2010-05-22T14:59:00.004+01:00

IMDB LINK
Starring: Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Max von Sydow, William Hurt, Mark Strong

He Said:
This is not a film you can go into with preconceptions. The common comparison between The Gladiator and Robin Hood is fair but not significant. (As both were directed by Ridley Scott and both starred Russel Crowe.) This film is really more of a prequel to the story of Robin Hood more than it is a story about the fabled outlaw/hero. It is a very realistic look into a fantastic fable.

A lot of critics have mentioned that Australian born Crowe took a tour of the British Isles with his accent, but to be fair his accent never distracted me from his story. I enjoyed this film I feel that it is worth watching, and I think most film goers will leave the theatre feeling their hard earned money was well spent.

One of the highest praises I have for this film is that Ridley Scott refrained from using CGI for his battle scenes and actually cast 1,000 extras for the intense battle scenes. Having a thousand people all doing what you want and managing to get the footage you want is a true talent and one that in this Computer generated 3D hype of today is sorely missing.

The only real complaint I have of this film i that for a hero that is known for his Archery skills Robin was a little too friendly with his sword. A long the same lines, I did not see one arrow split during this film, though I have to wonder if I had would I have assumed it to be a Robing Hood cop out? I half expected to see a notice at the end of the film reading "No arrows were harmed in the making of this film."

Minor complaints aside this is a well executed film and one that you will not regret watching. I enjoyed this Robin before he was the Hood tale, and I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

She Said:

I really enjoyed this film, although there wasn't much doubt that I would; it is a film based on classic legend that never fails to disappoint. Everyone knows the story of Robin Hood through some interpretation or other whether it be Prince of Thieves or Disney's crack at it.

Although I don't think this film eclipses the success of Prince of Thieves (i.e. that one with Kevin Costner not doing a British accent) it does give the audience something a bit different from the legend. This film is much more of a prequel to the 'outlaw that takes from the rich and gives to the poor' tale, telling you how we got to that point.

This film is also placed into a wider context of the history of the time namely the vulnerability of England during King Richard's decade long crusade and the country's relationship to France. I found it quite interesting to see the classic tale from a different angle.

Unlike Costner in Prince of Thieves Russell Crowe did attempt the Nottingham accent. Like James said he does take a tour of the British Isles (and pops down under for a visit) and it begs the question: why not a British accent? But this is a minor grievance to bear and overall I have no real complaints about the film.

I wouldn't be surprised if this film was followed up with a sequel and the more widely known tales of the famous man. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They Said:

A well executed film with a twist on the legend of Robin Hood. We give this film {{{8 out of 10}}}

The Time Travelers Wife (Directed by Robert Schwentke)

2010-05-17T12:07:00.013+01:00

IMDB LINK

Starring: Rachel McAdams, Eric Bana, Ron Livingston

He Said:
I have had this particular film on my LoveFilm queue for ages then Helen and I finally gave in and just purchased the film. This is a fantastic adaption of Audrey Niffenegger's novel of the same name. There are scenes and character relationships in the novel that are all but ignored in the film but I can gladly say that this is a rare occurrence where the adaption and source material complement each other.

The basic story of this film revolves around the romance of one couple dealing with an unprecedented medical condition. Through out the course of the film you see the two characters grow and mature contrasting to one another. When we first see the titular character she has found her childhood best friend for the first time, while he is introduced to some one he has never seen before.

This is a beautiful story about an ill-fated romance and how two people can make a relationship work no matter the obstacles or trials before them. This is at its heart a film about romance but it is so much more than that. I can not say enough good things about the story or the characters that shape it.

The casting of Claire is absolutely spot on, and I think Henry grows on me after a while. I know when I was reading the novel I had a different actor in my minds eye but I can't remember it as of this moment. I really adored this film and I think it would make an excellent addition to anyone's film collection. I give it [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

She Said:

I am a little more skeptical about this film as a complement to its source material than James. I personally feel that the film did not quite do the book justice however that doesn't mean I think it wasn't good! On the contrary, the film clearly captures the dichotomy of love and loss that is the battle when Henry time travels.

There was just something missing that was disappointing for me and I think, if I'm honest, that this story is best told in book medium for its emotional complexity. While the film tries to achieve this with montages I think the consumer benefits from the extra detail in the relationships that come from the book, particularly those with Henry's doctor and their friend Gomez.

However I am comparing to the book and shouldn't be. Ignoring the fact I read the book this is enjoyable and heartwarming which is what I expected from this film. Eric Bana and Rachel McAdams had a great chemistry, and although this was either of their best roles though, they acted with subtly and credibility. My favourite actress was Rachel as a little girl though. So cute.

In terms of plot this story is unique and intriguing. It is an interesting twist on time travel being that Henry does not travel by a time machine, but involuntarily and unexpectedly as the result of a genetic condition. It is fascinating stuff which seems oddly more believable than other time travel plots. Plus the film coped with Henry's random aging very well with hair and makeup.

If there had just been a tad more focus on Rachel without resorting to montages this would have been a half point more. However I still give it a very respectable {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They Said:

A unique and clever story wonderfully told. Everyone should watch this film and even read the book. It is a classic romance with modern twist that should be recognised as brilliant. We give this {{{8 out of 10}}}

Hot Tub Time Machine (Directed by Steve Pink)

2010-05-13T14:36:00.007+01:00

IMDB LINK

Starring: John Cusack, Clark Duke, Craig Robinson, Rob Corddry, Crispin Glover, Chevy Chase

He said:

This film has to have the worst title of any film we have ever reviewed. I almost want to knock it's rating lower solely because of the title alone. Despite the god awful title this film is actually a lot of fun through out it's 99 minute runtime. Helen and I both love John Cusack and have wanted to see this film since we first saw the trailer. I am happy to say that the film's content set a bar far superior to its title.

Steve Pink might not be a name that you recognize off hand but his name had been attached to quite a few films that you might have seen, Grosse Pointe Blank, High Fidelity and Accepted. (The first two also happen to have John Cusack in a leading role.) Pink is a brilliant director that doesn't pull any punches. This film has a nostalgic feel that is reminiscent to films like The Wedding Singer and Back to the Future.

This is a fantastic film that has a lot of well timed and executed jokes breathing life into the near dead R-rated comedy genre that films like Hangover are trying desperately trying to revive. One of the best running jokes in the film involves Crispin Glover that I can say was worth the price of admission alone.

This is a film that despite it's ridiculous premise and celebrating a decade most of us would rather forget, finds it's audience early and holds on to the very end of the film. Some of the comedy is crass, and at times gag worthy, but this is a film that is worth your time. I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She Said:

Sometimes you come across a film that is so wonderfully bad that you want to watch it over and over again. This film is tacky and crass but unlike many films it is deliberately ridiculous. It walks the line of over-the-top while keep a hand on the side of irony and I have to say I LOVE IT.

As James said the title may put you off a bit. But after the opening sequence you already get a sense of the tounge-in-cheek nature of this film. Much like The Wedding Singer this protrayal of the eighties is a hyperbolic pastiche. There are brick-like mobile phones, brightly coloured shell suits and an irrational fear of communism. It is meant to be loud both visually and in the plot development - and it does just this.

I also appreciated the Crispin Glover on-going gag throughout the film. Being a complete Back to the Future nerd (James too) we loved even just the presence of Crispin Glover. And it is always great to see him in a comedy role like this. The other actors were also great. Rob Corddry, who plays the obnoxious sometimes vile 'friend in need' is perfect in this role.

If you find it hard to watch a film and dettach yourselves from sense and judgement and allow the hilarity to consume then avoid this film. Otherwise grab it on DVD when its out, get some mates round, have a bottle of wine and some nibbles and just enjoy! I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said: A great film with less than subtle mocking of a terrible decade. Plus... John Cusack... come on! We give this film {{{{8 out of 10}}}}

Double Feature: Toe Tapping Numbers

2010-05-11T09:28:00.004+01:00

This weeks Double Features: Footloose and Cabaret

Footloose (Directed by Herbert Ross)

IMDB LINK

Starring: Kevin Bacon, Lori Singer, John Lithgow, Dianne Wiest, Chris Penn, Sarah Jessica Parker

He Said:

This is a film that I have avoided watching for a long while. I have heard a lot of good things about it. (and actually would like to see the stage performance on the West End or Broadway) but it never really appeared to be anything more than a dated movie from the 80's. In a lot of ways that is the films largest strength. The film is so very dated in every aspect that the film is a laugh riot from beginning to end.

The main story of an outsider from the big city coming to a small sleepy town and making trouble by trying to wake it up, is not the most original concept but it works in this film very well. The fact that dancing and music with anymore rhythm or beat to it than Hymns are actually against the law is a very interesting comment on what temptation is.

There is a nod to Fahrenheit 451, when some of the towns leaders begin to take to extremes the "protection" needed for their town and their children. I think this film has a lot of depth and a strong message that would have very easily been glossed over and even ignored in other similar formatted films.

I really enjoyed this film and if you have a hankering for a good dose of 80's music (not to mention a Sarah Jessica Parker 26 years younger looking almost exactly as she does now.) you will enjoy it as well, I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

She Said:

This is one of those films I am not really sure why I had never watched before. I think, like Fame, it was made in just slightly the wrong era for me. Made a few years before I was a born it was probably deemed either too adult or too eighties for my parents to watch it. Probably the latter.

Overall I found it enjoyable although a little slow in places. However, having watched a few classic eighties films recently, thinking that old films are slow is probably just a symptom of watching too many turn-of-the-millennium big budget films.

As James says the plot isn't the most original but it works. A town that sees music as a sin is the perfect setting for a coming of age film. And, while not a musical in the traditional sense, this film is driven by music and dance albeit very dated music and dance.

I was interested to see that the Billy Elliot 'angry dance' is almost shot for shot taken from Kevin Bacon's angry dance in Footloose. I got a real kick out of recognising this and perhaps other people will notice similar things that are a homage to this film.

Not the best film I have ever seen, but definitely worth a watch. There are some great characters especially John Lithgow who almost steals the show from Bacon... if it were not for Bacon's god-awful eighties dancing. The leg warmers in the intro did warn me though! I say this all with love. I give it {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They Said: A fun film ideal for a random 80's night film fest. We'd be interested in seeing the stage version with some more updated dance style. We give it {{{7.5 out of 10}}}}

Cabaret (Directed by Bob Fosse)

Starring: Liza Minnelli, Michael York

IMDB LINK

She Said:

Cabaret is one of those films that sticks in your mind. I had seen a high school stage version of Cabaret when I was younger and was surprised to find I still remembered all the songs. The film will stick, I'm sure, for even longer.

The thing that this film really had going for it is basically Liza Minelli and her chemistry with the other characters especially Micheal York. Her performance is hyper, brash, witty and fantastic which is also, not coincidentally, my impression of the film overall.

The film has a lot in common with Chicago which was originally staged and choreographed by Bob Fosse just like Cabaret. The dancing style is very unique. It is provocative, sharp and has a 'contortionist' feel to it (if you have seen the stage version of Chicago you will hopefully get what I mean). Also like Chicago, Cabaret provides a satirical look at the time in which it is situated creating an ironic song and dance out of the beginning of Nazi Germany. Imagine the Sound of Music if Julie Andrews took speed, ditched the kids and donned a corset and fish nets.

Set in the Kit Kat Club (a cabaret, or variety show if you like) the other memorable performance is the 'master of ceremonies' who leads most of the numbers. His songs are performed to the audience which adds to the irony. All his numbers are making statements about, for example, the lure of money in 30s Berlin or the danger of relationships with Jews. But it is done with wit and vibrant expression.

Hey, 'life is a Cabaret', right? I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

He Said:

This film like Helen has said above has a very Chicago feel to it. Though I am certain if I had seen this prior to Chicago the same would have been true in reverse. Which makes sense as Bob Fosse is the creative force behind them both. This film far exceeded my expectations and will undoubtedly make me try even harder to see it on the West End.

Liza Minnelli really is fantastic in this film, every part of her went into this film and I honestly think only someone with as large a personality as her could take on the roll of Sally Bowles. The Master of Ceremonies repeatedly breaks the fourth wall of the film and largely plays as the Id of the characters, often voicing their hopes, fears desires and greed.

Michael York has had a very extensive career though most (like myself) will recognize him as Basil from the Austin Powers franchise. I feel that his character Brian often plays a second fiddle to Sally, though his development and growth far exceeds hers as the film progresses.

This is a fantastic musical and classic film, and unlike the very dated Footloose has proved to still be fresh despite it's test in time. A fun little side note to mention is how much A 26 year old Liza Minnelli resembles a similar aged Anne Hathaway. I really enjoyed this film and would suggest that it be on your DVD shelf at home I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

They Said:

This is a film that will stick in your mind long after the disk has stopped spinning. If you like jazzy music and provocative dancing then this is for you. We give it {{{8 out of 10}}}

That Thing You Do (Written and Directed By Tom Hanks)

2010-05-10T11:28:00.009+01:00

IMDB LINK

Requested by Andy Mason on our Facebook page.

Starring:
Tom Everett Scott, Liv Tyler, Johnathon Schaech, Steve Zahn, Ethan Embry, Tom Hanks, Charlize Theronm, Giovanni Ribisi

She Said:

I think I had seen this film when I was about 11 and although I didn't remember much of the content I do recall coming away from the VHS happy and content. This is the same way I felt rewatching now. Here is a film that is harmless fun but with a message to deliver; commercial fame comes with a price.

This was Tom Hanks directorial debut on the big screen - having directed a few TV episodes prior to this - and I have to say that he obviously knows what I like. It ticks all my feelgood film boxes relating to costume, soundtrack, actors, etc. If you weren't aware I am a big fan of the birth of the teenager and the U.S. fifties commercial boom... which is a fancy way of saying 'the rock and roll era'. And this film deals with the love child of The Beatles and rock and roll's - pop rock.

The thing I like most about the plot and directing of this film is that the obligatory warning that 'fame isn't all it is cracked up to be' doesn't overshadow the film; it isn't shoved into your face, rather it is gently interwined in the overall plot development.

As James will also tell you Liv Tyler is the stand out performance and it is her character that dictates when the film is light and when is darker. For example, when she is happy the audience is happy. A character that guides the audience must be difficult to judge but she plays it beautifully.

The film is enjoyable throughout and I can gurantee it will make everyone smile from children to golden oldies. I give this film {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

He Said:
Another entrance of a film driven by music, (see Footloose, Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist), This film is a simple story of a band making it big a year after the Beatles explosion in the '60's.

The film is written and directed by Tom Hanks and is well paced and a very fun film through out. Marking the feature film debut of Charlize Theron, as well as stellar performances from the entire ensemble cast. The strongest performance in my opinion from Liv Tyler as the lead singers girlfriend that catches the blunt edge of the bands sudden fame.

This is a fun film that will drill the lyrics of the title song into your head (and if you are anything like me find yourself singing it well into the next week.) While this film paints a slightly friendlier picture of early rock and roll stardom than say the more gritty and less rose tinted glasses film Almost Famous it is a fantastic film and worth renting.

Tom Hanks wears a lot of hats in this film as the Writer, Director and even an actor, (playing the representative of one of the labels interested in the Oneders.) He handles each roll (in front and behind the camera) with a grace and smoothness rarely seen in Hollywood today. I really enjoyed this film and would suggest it to anyone looking for a light hearted comedy
I give it [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

They Said:
If you want a film that has a fair share of smiles and grins along the way as well as a catchy song (that might stick around long after the DVD player stops spinning we think you will enjoy this film we give it {{{9 out of 10}}}

IRON MAN 2 (Directed by Jon Favreau)

2010-05-06T08:00:00.000+01:00

IMDB LINK

Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Don Cheadle, Scarlett Johansson, Gwyneth Paltrow, Sam Rockwell, Mickey Rourke, Samuel L. Jackson

He Said:

A rare example of a sequel being as good (if not better than) the original. This film is not without its flaws (the second act seems a bit slow.) But over all a very enjoyable experience. The story made sense and even with everything that was going on it was very easy to keep track of all of the sub-plots.

It has been said a number of times before but never has a character been portrayed so spot on by an actor as Tony Stark by Robert Downey Jr. Given Downey Jr's somewhat chaotic and even at times erratic past behavior, he slips into the Tony Stark Persona as though it was written with him in mind.

The Sam Rockwell character portrayal of Justin Hammer was also spot on, as the man who wants to be Tony Stark, a fun side note is that Sam rockwell was one of the original actors being considered for the Tony Stark roll that eventually went to Robert Downey Jr. Rockwell's portrayal of Justin Hammer the contemporary rival of Stark, is portrayed with just a hint of jealousy and envy that is very entertaining.

I would be remiss if I didn't mention the outstanding (if somewhat minor) performance of Mickey Rourke. Rourke (another actor in the midst of a surprising comeback) actually learned to speak fluent Russian for his portrayal of Ivan Vanko with the unnamed alias Whiplash. A very different character from 2008's The Wrestler, Rourke has shown a quiet confidence that I am sure will further cement his A list status.

One of my few complaints with the film is with the Scarlett Johansson portrayal of Natalie Rushman (the similarly unnamed alias of Black Widow) while she looked every bit the part, she didn't sound it, as the character is supposed to be Russian as well. Though there is mention of her being fluent in Russian in the film. I did really enjoy this film and think that everyone that enjoys action films will enjoy this as well. I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

She Said:

I like the Iron Man films because where they could easily slip into 'just another action hero film' they are more intelligent; with a proper story with humour and depth. I felt that it was on a par with the first film although, as James said, the second act was a bit slow.

Although Iron Man and Hulk already nodded towards the upcoming Avengers movies, I felt that this had a feel of prequel about it. The Avengers plot was intertwined with the main story of this film and I felt like it was easier for fans to follow. Luckily I saw it with Marvel man James our comic book nerd friend Ross.

As with Iron Man I was impressed by the set designs and CGI in this film. The futuristic looking technology was fantastic with floating computer screens controlled by hand movements (almost a staple for film techs since Minority Report) but not so ridiculous that it looked unbelievable.

Overall I feel that this film had lived up to its hype and of course Robert Downey Jr lived and breathed Tony Stark effortlessly. Rockwell and Rourke were great nemeses for Iron Man although perhaps they could have been developed more if not for the Avengers sub-plot pushing in on screen time. That isn't a criticism... just a thought.

If you liked Iron Man then you will like this. I suggest seeing it with someone who doesn't looked blank at the following words: Captain America, Thor, Avengers. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They Said:

A film that could have very easily became a live action rock-em sock-em robots (actually already in development) has a great story and stands well on its own. We give it {{{8 out of 10}}}

Double feature: Sparks flying

2010-05-05T08:08:00.001+01:00

Double feature of Dear John and The Last Song, both adapted form Nicholas Sparks books.

Dear John (directed by Lasse Hallström)

IMDB page

Starring: Channing Tatum, Amanda Seyfried, Richard Jenkins, Henry Thomas

He said:
This film hit a bit close to home for me as Helen mentions below, but much like all of Nicholas Spark's novels adapted for film this film hit the nail on the head. There are a lot of authors that have little to say to the production team after they sell their novel. I really think that Nicholas Sparks is there as much as he can get away with.

Though not all of his films follow the narrative of the novels on which they are based they keep the heart and over all feel of the story that inspired them. Fans of Stephen King and Dean Koontz can bare witness to how rare and usually hit and miss a film treatment can be. Ken Kessey has never seen the film of his 1973 novel "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" as they changed nearly everything but the title.

The actors all did a fantastic job, though I did have a little laugh when I remembered that Channing Tatum has played a soldier numerous times in his recent films (including Stop Loss and the less credible, GI JOE) he has come along way since his little dancing films. Richard Jenkins as Tatum's Autistic father is superb as well.

Amanda Seyfried has become a bankable name in a relatively short amount of time as well. the last three years have seen her in numerous films each of them a bigger and more challenging roll than the one previous. She doesn't disappoint here at all, her character really sacrifices the most and sees the most amount of growth over the course of the film.

I really enjoyed this film and feel it is very much inline with Sparks' previous film adaptions definitely worth watching. I give this film [[[4 out of 5]]]

She said:

I have admit that I wasn't sure about this. Not because I think it was going to be bad but because it is close to home in several ways. James used to be in the U.S. Army, and we also came from 5000 miles apart to be together. So the hardships of maintaining long distance relationships and the thought of what I would do if James were in the Army now were at the forefront of my mind. But, as I expected, this movie was well made and highly enjoyable (and yes... there was a tear or two).

The story was linear with subplots being very much still in the main storyline. In my opinion it takes a good director to pull off a linear film in a time when audiences have come to expect complex and diverse plots. I enjoyed watching a film that was different in this way; something refreshing.

The thing this film really had going for it was the acting. Dealing with subjects such as war and terrorism, loss and understanding, the actors could have easily slipped into cliched representations of their charcaters. However I felt that Seyfried and Tatum were believable and accurate with the passion and longing they conveyed. However I was most impressed by Richard Jenkins who played Tatum's dad, a man with some form of undiagnosed autistic spectrum disorder. The face avoidance and routine he portrayed was believable and sympathetic.

I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:

If you do see this film, whatever you do don't see it with a class of screaming school girls. We speak from experience. Despite this hindrance we still loved this movie. We give it {{{8 out of 10}}}

The Last Song (directed by Julie Anne Robinson)

Starring: Miley Cyrus, Greg Kinnear, Bobby Coleman, Liam Hemsworth, Hallock Beals, Kelly Preston

IMDB page

He said:

This is one of the few Nicholas Sparks books I haven't yet had the chance to read, and I think that I am going to search it out to see just how different it is from the film. This film is the first time that Nicholas Sparks has adapted one of his own novels. I am very curious as to why he chose to go in that specific direction.

According to the other reviews I have read on the novel the character of Ronnie (Miley Cyrus) is strong and independent and over all a fantastic role model. Unfortunately Miley's portrayal of the Ronnie comes off as a bit of an annoying attitude driven extrovert. I don't want to give the impression that this is a bad film. It just wasn't as good as it should have been.

Miley Cyrus has accomplished the monumental task of proving she can act (as opposed to the Hannah Montana/Miley where she is just playing Miley in a wig). Unfortunately for her she isn't very good at it. To be fair she is just 17 and might learn some skills that others are born with. I don't know about anyone else but her teeth are incredibly distracting to me, they never seem to fit correctly into her mouth, which quite frankly took me out of the film more than once.

Greg Kinnear's portrayal of Ronnie's father, Steve was very well played and with out giving anything away I thought his character was handled very well and with the grace of only an actor of his caliber could achieve. Some of the most touching moments of the film are of Steve and Jonah (the younger brother) and have very little dialogue.

This film isn't the best film we have seen this year but it is far from the worst. I give it [[[3 out of 5]]]

She said:

In short this film is decidedly average. It wasn't terrible... it just wasn't great. I felt that the direction, as James said, was a little misplaced. I wanted more focus on Ronnie's relationship with her dad but it seemed to be primarily about her boyfriend (who was in Neighbours, an Australian soap that I love!). Maybe they were trying to win over younger fans with this direction?

Cyrus was also average in her acting. I also was highly distracted by her mouth and teeth, although I can't blame bad acting on her genetic makeup. She was often wooden and her New York accent had definately drifted 1500 hundred miles south-west. The chracater of Ronnie you could tell was complex; she was messed up about her parents seperation. I got it... but I didn't feel it.

If you are a Miley fan you will probably enjoy this film but don't go into it expecting a masterpiece. It often edges on tacky but maintains interest and investment nevertheless. I give this film an average {{{3 out of 5}}}

They said:
While we wouldn't suggest running out to see this film in theaters, it would be fine for a night in. We give it {{{6 out of 10}}}

Better than Chocolate (directed by Anne Wheeler)

2010-04-30T07:37:00.009+01:00

IMDB page

Starring: Wendy Crewson, Karyn Dwyer, Christina Cox, Ann-Marie MacDonald, Marya Delver, Kevin Mundy

She said:

This was a new film to me but James had seen it as a teenager. He kind of sold it to me as this semi-porn film about hot lesbians (thats the impression I got) but it wasn't that at all. Trust a teenage boy to remember only the nude bits huh? It was actually a sensitive comedy film exploring the rights of lesbians and transgendered people in Canada.

What I enjoyed most was the good balance of comic relief with passion and sensuality. I guess the film to me was about being who you are, standing up for what you believe in but without making it this big, heavy war on society. The characters were all likable from the mum who has become lost in her own life, to Judy who is yearning for acceptance of being trans gender, to Francis the gender-ambiguous lesbian erotica shop.

Another theme in this film that I enjoyed was the importance of art from singing and performing, to fine and conceptual art. It tied up the sense of free spirits and the self expression so important and integral to this film. I was impressed. I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

He said:
I absolutely adore this film, I think that my memories of watching it when it first premiered on HBO are slightly tainted by the hot lesbians making out. [seriously I mean body paint took on a whole new meaning] (which to be honest is a lot tamer than I remember)

As Helen says this really is a very sweet movie about figuring out who you are and what that means. All of the characters are handled very well and and at no point does one character out shine the other.

One of my favorite scenes involves Judy and a song that she sings in the local alternate lifestyle bar. This scene has one of my favorite lyrics of all time, "My tender trans gender heart." Which I can be heard muttering frequently when ever anyone says tender or heart.

I honestly can not say enough good things about this film other than to tell you it is worth watching, though there are scenes that are a little too blatant for the younger audiences it is a great film about equality and accepting yourself and those around you for who you are. I give this film [[[4.5 out of 5]]]

They said:

This is a gem of a find and you should give it a go... unless you are a homophobe... in which case there may be a problem.I can't think of anyone I have ever know that hasn't dealt with a crisis of self that wouldn't benefit from this film. We give this film {{{9 out of 10}}}

The Lost Boys (Directed by Joel Schumacher)

2010-04-29T07:05:00.006+01:00

IMDB page

Starring: Kiefer Sutherland, Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, Jason Patric, Dianne Wiest

He said
This film has lost so much of what made it great. As Helen mentions below it feels very dated. The funny thing about this film is all of the huge names behind the camera, Richard Donner (Of the Superman films) and Joel Shumacher (Pirates of the Caribbean and countless others) This film was one of Shumacher's first as a director and it seems to have served him well.

Unlike Helen, I did watch this film as young impressionable child, I remember it being a lot scarier and a lot darker. The sequel (which we will review in an upcoming post) has a lot darker tone and promises to be more inline with what I remember in a modern realization.

A fun side note there was originally to be an earlier sequel titled the Lost Girls where it was revealed that David (Kiefer Sutherland) survived the final battle. (In the film he is staked by a pair of antlers and doesnt explode as the others of his brood.)

Dated or not this is still a campy fun film and great for a night when nothing is on tv, I give this film [[[3.5 out of 5]]]

She said:

As a 23 year old you may find it shocking for me to say that I had never seen this film before. And I think I unfortunately missed out on it a bit! It was okay but it really didn't blow me away as I expected. The reason? It was SO dated.

The Lost Boys didn't keep my attention in the way I thought it would. I think that it was a bit slow for a modern audience and I really couldn't work out if the acting and cinematography was deliberately cheesy or not. With other dated films, such as The Goonies, there is a deliberate attempt to make it light and a bit cheesy. But this was trying to be dark and scary... and I didn't quite get it.

Saying all this it was still enjoyable and I can see the lure that it has over people. It dealt with vampires before Bram Stoker's Dracula, before Buffy and definately before Twilight so was at the beginning of the modern media obsession (I say modern because of course vampires have been an obsession for hundreds of years).

I am glad I saw this film, I just wish I could go back in time and watch at a sleepover when I was 10. I feel like I would have got more out of it. I give this film a respectable {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

They said:
This is a film full of camp and what once passed as terror, its worth a viewing and we both agree you wouldn't be disappointed. we give it {{{7 out of 10}}}

Cemetery Junction (Directed by Gervais/Merchant)

2010-04-26T16:54:00.009+01:00

IMDB page

Starring: Christian Cooke, Tom Hughes, Jack Doolan, Felicity Jones, Ralph Fiennes, Emily Watson, Matthew Goode, Ricky Gervais

He said:
I am always pleasantly surprised when I like a truly British film, I don't know if it is the arrogant American attitude, or that my prior experience to British film was limited to bigger hits, HOT FUZZ, Shaun of The Dead, and Saving Grace, to name a few.

I hope that this film does well on the other side of the pond as it has a lot of themes that I think would translate well to the American Collegiate demographic. Helen will give you the majority of the themes below, but really I think this film handles a handful of cliches really well, with out ever feeling heavy handed or morally superior.

I really enjoyed this film and would definitely recommend you watch it at your first opportunity. I give it [[[4 out of 5]]]

She said:

The trailer shows that this is a British film written and directed by Ricky Gervias and Stephen Merchant, set in the seventies, about disillusioned youths and has All the Young Dudes by David Bowie in the background. It was aimed at people such as myself and I was drawn in hook, line and sinker. This film did not disappoint.

It was refreshing to see something new and different from the amazing Gervias/Merchant duo: something cool rather than awkward and heartwarming rather than cringeworthy. The film is essentially a 'coming of age' film or a 'journey of self discovery' or another similarly cliched phrase. But the film itself isn't cliched. It is funny, charming and my old favourite, thought provoking.

The three main characters made a good spectrum of youth - one trying to be the 'cool guy', one being the 'obligatory loser' and the other trying to be something different! Without giving anything away this film is about realising that what you thought you want out of life, and what you are doing with it isn't necessarily what your heart is truly telling you. Hence the journey of enlightenment crap I mentioned earlier. I give this film {{{4 out of 5}}}

They said:
This isn't your typical laugh riot Gervias/Merchant film, but it has a great heart and will leave you with a solid smile and good feeling as the credits roll. We strongly recommend this film to everyone and proudly give it {{{8 out of 10}}}

Double feature: it's all about the lifestyle

2010-04-26T16:17:00.014+01:00

Double feature review of American Psycho and The Joneses!

American Psycho (directed by Mary Harron)
IMDB page

She said:

This film struck me in a lot of ways. More than just a film about a psychopathic murderer, this was commenting on the fakeness of a certain lifestyle. I was impressed by the way the director deftly weaves the murder scenes into a film about a man who is emotionally missing from his life.

There was a big play on the theme of masks, reflections, signs of the self (i.e. business cards) etc which mirrored the warped sense of reality the eighties business men, with their fancy suits and ripped bodies, were living in. It was really quite fascinating. Where better for a murder to hide than in a world of portraying masks and false images to make other people think a certain way of them.

If you enjoy thriller-horrors that have some intelligence to them then try out this film. It gives a great representation of the executive eighties lifestyle (such as brick mobile phones and those terrible slate grey suits that were so popular) and a nice bit of bloody violence to go with. I give this film {{{3.5 out of 5}}}

He said:
This film is one of those that you find yourself watching when you need something to pass the time. It isn't the best movie you'll ever sit down to watch but I would be very surprised if you didn't enjoy it in spite of yourself.

Helen pointed out the Masks and ideas of self above, one of the things that struck me so much about this character was his obsessive and at times intrusive knowledge of popular music.

Having gone with out being said, I really think Pat Bateman is convinced that his unending knowledge of musicians earns him a higher rank among his peers. (Though we tend to see his knowledge of music right before a very desperate and typically carnal acts.)

This is a fun movie to watch especially if Batman Begins was your first glimpse of Christian Bale as an actor. I would give this film [[[[3.5 out of 5]]]]

They said: So y'know... sex and murders... yay voyeurism!? We give this film {{{7 out of 10}}}

The Joneses (directed by Derrick Borte)
IMDB page

She said:

In short (although you know I'll ramble a bit after this sentence anyway) this film had a promising start but then died a slow and dull death until the curtains closed and we woke up.

The idea behind the film is of course 'keeping up with the Joneses' - this family is a unit of salespeople whose job is to show off the products that make up their lifestyle, and get other people to buy into it. This plot is quite genius actually. Both James and I want to have a go at this job please! It is the American Dream without the working to get their bit - the work IS it.

After this was established the family/unit started to fall apart... and so too did the plot. The writer and director seemed to have lost focus after the first act. There were interesting moral questions that were raised but not explored and sub-plots and characters introduced that never developed.

I wanted this film to end at least half an hour before it did. It was okay, but I wouldn't waste your money to be honest. I give this a generous {{{2.5 out of 5}}}.

He said:

Much like Helen I was ready for this films end credits long before they graced the screen. I am slightly curious about a couple of characters that obviously had established subplots in early versions of the script (only to have them lost in the rewrites)

I really can't say too many good things about this film other than the fact that it made me want to pursue a career like the Joneses. I could go on and on about lack of character development (and even one slightly clever twist mid-way through the film) but I would rather not waste your time.

I will say that the trailer sold this film really well, and for the first 45 minutes the film delivered as promised, unfortunately like most creative ad campaigns it's all the small print that eventually sinks the ship...

I am not feeling as generous as Helen today (Despite my very good mood) and must rate this film [[[[2 out of 5]]]]

They said:
This movie had a trailer that sold it well, unfortunately the film wasn't worth the price of admission.... {{{we give it 4.5 out of 10}}}

Clash of the Titans [2D] (Directed by Louis Leterrier)

2010-04-20T18:11:00.005+01:00

IMDB page

He said:
I think we both walked out of this film pleasantly surprised. I didn't go into the theatre with huge expectations, and that alone might be why I was more impressed than displeased. This is another film that unfortunately felt the need to tack on the 3D effects after the fact. Once again it is unnecessary we enjoyed this film in it's original 2D format and did not at any point feel that we had missed out on any thing.
There are things I could gripe about, as Helen says below, the music felt less of an accompaniment and more of separate character. (think Wayans' Brothers in, well any film they are ever in.)
A nod to the original film with the mechanical owl was a nice touch, though it will mostly go unnoticed by the majority of audiences that haven't seen the original film. I enjoyed this film and wouldn't mind having it on my DVD shelf for a night in need of Epic stories with out journeying into Peter Jackson's Tolkein Universe. I give this film {{{{3.5 out of 5}}}}

She said:

We went into this not expecting great things (mainly due to our cyncical yet still adoring belief in Blockbuster films) but I actually came out pleasently surprised. There were elements of this film that I could pick at - and I will do in just a moment - but overall I enjoyed this film. It was an epic fantasy which I am a sucker for and it really wasn't terrible.

Now for the picky bit. I have two main issues. One is with the music. I felt that it could have added to the epic, grandiose story rather than walk the line of fantasy meets heavy metal. I felt like it did not quite sit right. It was too self concious rather than becoming part of the whole.

My other bone to pick was about the special effects and the reason is similar. The effects were (as you would expect) fantastic. The mythological creatures were great fun but I wanted more from them. I wanted more close ups; details of these magnificant beasts. I also wanted great, epic wide shots rather than fighting for a glimpse of the whole. I think they again were being too self-concious in their teasing of the audience. I like to be teased to a point. Then I want to see the frickin monster properly.

Apart from these things - and some occasional badly directed acting - the film was very good. I would see it again. I give this film a respectable {{{3.5 our of 5}}}

They said:

If you do want to see it, then watch in 2D. You really aren't missing much. If you have little to no knowledge of Greek mythology this will probably be a fascinating watch! We give it {{{7 out of 10}}}

Kinky Boots (Directed by Julian Jarrold)

2010-04-15T07:23:00.007+01:00

IMDB PAGE

Starring: Joel Edgerton, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Sarah-Jane Potts, Nick Frost, Jemima Rooper

She said:

I love this film. If you have watched the trailer then you may be a bit unsure of likelihood of this combination: a northern factory enlists the help of a drag queen and starts making sexy boots for men... who are actually women. It does sound funny, and slightly preposterous but guess what - it is a true story!

I love this film because it has a great balance between drama and comedy. It also deals with the much debated but rarely resolved question of 'what makes a man'. There are three main characters that contribute to this debate: Charlie, the factory owner, Lola the drag queen, and Don a factory worker. Together they create a spectrum of masculinity.

Don is very much the 'mans man' who is hostile to Lola when she arrive. Lola is on the other end, a 'woman's man' if you like. Lola, aka Simon, isn't gay - he has recognised the things women want from men and has become them (sensitive, caring, etc). Charlie is the inbetween. He isn't quite sure where he lies in the spectrum and with his relationship breaking down he struggles with this.

I have rambled on enough but overall this film is a quirky, hearfelt British film that will have you laughing along. I recommend you watch it now! I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

He said:
I found Kinky Boots a pleasantly surprising film. I really wasn't sure what to expect when I sat down to watch it. I think at first glance I expected it to be campy similar to Hedwig & The Angry Inch and at moments it does have that feel, though never losing it's grip on the reality of the story.

Over all this is a film about perception, as a man and of ones self. I feel of all the characters that we got to know the one we understand the least was Charlie. His fiancé has an off screen affair which he discovers and never really reacts to, and at the climax of the film it seems his motivations for his actions have nothing to do with penance and seem to be more about covering his own ass.

It is a fantastic film and definetly worth watching but I would have liked to see a little more devolpment with Charlie's character. I did enjoy this film and would recommend it with out reservation. I give it {{{{3.5 out of 5}}}}

They said:

If you like heartfelt comedy dramas and er... men in drag doing show numbers, then this is the film for you! We give this {{{7.5 out of 10}}}

Whip It! (Directed by Drew Barrymore)

2010-04-09T07:45:00.003+01:00

IMDB PAGE

Starring:
Ellen Page, Marcia Gay Harden, Kristen Wiig, Drew Barrymore, Juliette Lewis, Jimmy Fallon, Alia Shawkat,Eve, Zoe Bell

She said:

This film was great fun; laugh out of loud funny, sexy, sassy and with a great soundtrack. Drew Barrymore (who, by the way, I LOVE) saw her directorial debut with this film and I have to say she did a wonderful job. The acting and pacing kept the balance of humour and sentiment really well. Her talent behind the camera is unsurprising though having been on film sets since she was a tiny 7 year old.

This is essentially a coming-of-age film. And I love those kind of films. They are not solely aimed at teens nor adults. I think some mums would enjoy this one and identify with a mother (played by the wonderful Marcia Gay Harden who is perfect for this 50s style housewife) who is finding it hard to let her daughter become an independent woman.

Although Ellen Page was the protagonist I did feel this was an ensemble film with the supporting characters all playing unique and individual roles. No one person stood out too much although I have to admit a soft spot for the best friend Pash. I found the friendship and the changes it undergoes both for the bad and good quite believable.

Overall I have to say - what a fantastic film! I came out of it wanting to don some skates, fishnets and hotpants and join the roller derby myself! I give it {{{4.5 out of 5}}}

He Said:

I really enjoyed this film. It has a solid story with an excellent pace. The soundtrack is perfect and even the subplots have a nice and even necessary feel. I never felt the side stories were diversions or fillers, as is common in so many films.

As Helen said this film marks the directorial debut of Drew Barrymore and I really think that she did a stellar job. Ellen Page has proven once more that she is more than just "that witty pregnant girl" as this film has heart and wit in spades. Juliet Lewis is in a rare small role and I think she is one of my favorite sub-characters.

The screenplay was written by Shauna Cross the author of the original novel who was an actual Roller derby athlete in Los Angeles (the films Hurl Scouts are based on her team Tough Cookies which had the same girl scout theme and team colors.) I think this fact alone is the reason that the film never seems to drift from reality into campy fantasy.

This is another American Film that is just now reaching the UK shores and if you are on the other side of the pond you can find this film at your local DVD retailer and rental stores, as well as on NETFLIX. I give this film {{{{4.5 out of 5}}}}

They said:
Drew Barrymore and Ellen Page make a great director/actress duo. We really enjoyed this film but what about you? Let us know! We give it [[[[9 out of 10]]]]

KICK-ASS (Directed by Matthew Vaughn)

2010-04-07T08:44:00.000+01:00

IMDB PAGE

Starring:
Aaron Johnson, Garrett M. Brown, Clark Duke, Evan Peters, Deborah Twiss, Lyndsy Fonseca, Sophie Wu, Elizabeth McGovern, Chloe Moretz, Nicolas Cage, Christopher Mintz-Plasse

He said:
In today's comic saturated film explosion it has become pretty common place to recognize names of heroes that not so long ago were barely recognized let alone well known. KICK-ASS is based on a comic book story, but this is not your atypical comic book film.

These costumed heroes are just average everyday teens, there wasn't a radio-active spider bite, or a super genius creating heroic robot costumes to save the day, no cosmic or Gamma radiation either, just kids asking the question do you need super powers to be a Superhero?

There are a lot of references to other comic heroes in this film (Nicholas Cage's character Big Daddy was almost completely based on Adam West's Batman sans polyester tights) there were countless references to everyones favorite neighborhood Spider-Man as well. (including an homage to the first film's initial leap off of a tall building) Comic geeks the world over will be boring each other with countless references for months I'm sure.

This film was fun and entertaining and admittedly at times slightly disturbing. It does feel a bit disjointed in the final act but it is definitely a film worth watching, I give it {{{4 out of 5}}}

She said:

Overall I enjoyed this film. I am not raving about it like a lot of other people I know who have seen it, but I did enjoy it. I liked the fact that this was comic superhero film meets quirky teen dramedy ala Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist or Juno. This isn't a film about superheros, it is a film about the effects of comics on average everyday life (loosely).

My reservation with this film comes in the third act where the irony ceases to be. The film-makers stopped making a point and being interesting about the effects of getting sucked into a make-believe superhero persona and began being about 'how much violence can we fit into this film before the credits rolled'.

I feel it could have stopped half an hour earlier and been much more impressive. But then I am not a fan of violence... because call me crazy but seeing children murder people doesn't excite me in the kind of 'I am loving this action' way.

It was fun to see a different type of superhero film... one I guess lacking the superheros! But I wish so much that it had heroes in this film, forget the super. Unfortunately it is less hero more misguided children killing people in the name of doing the right thing. I give it {{{3 out of 5}}}.

They said:
If you enjoy films like Watchmen and 300 this is definitely your cup of tea. we give it [[[7 out of 10]]]